Re: [stp-pmc] STP PMC callin info

[Carl Trieloff <cctrieloff@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Mike,

Thanks for the link - I should have just posted it instead of trying to 
paraphrase and yes
STP does inherit from standard top level v1.0 in its charter.

Regards
Carl.


Mike Milinkovich wrote:
> Carl,
>
> The committer process for STP is the standard one described at
> http://www.eclipse.org/projects/dev_process/Eclipse_Standard_TopLevel_Charte
> r_v1.0.php
>
> Pardon me if I'm just not seeing it, but I don't see a reference to a "vote
> from PMC" process. 
>
> It is acceptable for a project to list initial committers once it is first
> created. But after that, each project (aka "sub-project") is supposed to be
> nominating and electing their own committers following the process above.
> The PMC then approves the committer and refers his election to the EMO for
> provisioning.
>
>
>   
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: stp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> > [mailto:stp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Carl Trieloff
> > Sent: April 25, 2006 5:33 PM
> > To: STP PMC list
> > Subject: Re: [stp-pmc] STP PMC callin info
> >
> >
> > Dan,
> >
> > There are two processes that can be used, vote by committers 
> > based on contribution or vote from PMC. Once we have a good 
> > rate of code going we clearly need to use the first process, 
> > The second process is usefull for setup and for example if we 
> > work closely with WTP it might just make sense to vote a 
> > committer onto the project to help us in this area. So at 
> > this point we are still following Eclipse process.
> >
> > I will bring this up in the next PMC meeting, to switch to 
> > committer vote.
> >
> > Regards
> > Carl.
> >
> >
> > Daniel Berg wrote:
> >     
> > > Hi Oisin,
> > >
> > > Could you provide me with the STP PMC call-in information 
> > >       
> > for the PMC 
> >     
> > > meetings?  I wasn't even aware that we were holding separate PMC 
> > > meetings.
> > >
> > > Also, I am curious why we are not following the Eclipse process for 
> > > new committers?  Are these individuals contributing code?  
> > >       
> > Have they 
> >     
> > > worked on a subproject and earned their committer rights?  
> > >       
> > Or are they 
> >     
> > > just new to a group and someone wanted them added to the 
> > >       
> > project just 
> >     
> > > in case they were to do something?
> > >
> > > Eclipse projects are starting to catch some criticisms for not 
> > > following Eclipse foundation processes for new committers so I just 
> > > wanted to make sure we are doing things correctly.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Dan
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > *Oisin Hurley <ohurley@xxxxxxxx>*
> > > Sent by: stp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > 04/24/2006 08:45 AM
> > > Please respond to
> > > STP PMC list <stp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > >
> > > 	
> > > To
> > > 	STP PMC list <stp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > cc
> > > 	
> > > Subject
> > > 	[stp-pmc] Vote required for new committers request
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 	
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > At today's PMC call, I propose that we add
> > >
> > >  Mark Little     mark.little@xxxxxxxxx
> > >  Kevin Connor    kevin.connor@xxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > to the list of STP committers. If the PMC votes so, I will 
> > >       
> > follow up 
> >     
> > > with them on the required paperwork after the meeting.
> > >
> > >  regards
> > >    Oisin
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > stp-pmc mailing list
> > > stp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-pmc
> > >
> > >
> > >       
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >     
> > > --
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > stp-pmc mailing list
> > > stp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-pmc
> > >   
> > >       
> > _______________________________________________
> > stp-pmc mailing list
> > stp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-pmc
> >     
>
>