[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [stp-pmc] STP PMC callin info
|
Carl,
The committer process for STP is the standard one described at
http://www.eclipse.org/projects/dev_process/Eclipse_Standard_TopLevel_Charte
r_v1.0.php
Pardon me if I'm just not seeing it, but I don't see a reference to a "vote
from PMC" process.
It is acceptable for a project to list initial committers once it is first
created. But after that, each project (aka "sub-project") is supposed to be
nominating and electing their own committers following the process above.
The PMC then approves the committer and refers his election to the EMO for
provisioning.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: stp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:stp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Carl Trieloff
> Sent: April 25, 2006 5:33 PM
> To: STP PMC list
> Subject: Re: [stp-pmc] STP PMC callin info
>
>
> Dan,
>
> There are two processes that can be used, vote by committers
> based on contribution or vote from PMC. Once we have a good
> rate of code going we clearly need to use the first process,
> The second process is usefull for setup and for example if we
> work closely with WTP it might just make sense to vote a
> committer onto the project to help us in this area. So at
> this point we are still following Eclipse process.
>
> I will bring this up in the next PMC meeting, to switch to
> committer vote.
>
> Regards
> Carl.
>
>
> Daniel Berg wrote:
> >
> > Hi Oisin,
> >
> > Could you provide me with the STP PMC call-in information
> for the PMC
> > meetings? I wasn't even aware that we were holding separate PMC
> > meetings.
> >
> > Also, I am curious why we are not following the Eclipse process for
> > new committers? Are these individuals contributing code?
> Have they
> > worked on a subproject and earned their committer rights?
> Or are they
> > just new to a group and someone wanted them added to the
> project just
> > in case they were to do something?
> >
> > Eclipse projects are starting to catch some criticisms for not
> > following Eclipse foundation processes for new committers so I just
> > wanted to make sure we are doing things correctly.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Dan
> >
> >
> >
> > *Oisin Hurley <ohurley@xxxxxxxx>*
> > Sent by: stp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > 04/24/2006 08:45 AM
> > Please respond to
> > STP PMC list <stp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >
> >
> > To
> > STP PMC list <stp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > cc
> >
> > Subject
> > [stp-pmc] Vote required for new committers request
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > At today's PMC call, I propose that we add
> >
> > Mark Little mark.little@xxxxxxxxx
> > Kevin Connor kevin.connor@xxxxxxxxx
> >
> > to the list of STP committers. If the PMC votes so, I will
> follow up
> > with them on the required paperwork after the meeting.
> >
> > regards
> > Oisin
> > _______________________________________________
> > stp-pmc mailing list
> > stp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-pmc
> >
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > --
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > stp-pmc mailing list
> > stp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-pmc
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> stp-pmc mailing list
> stp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-pmc
