[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [stp-dev] Last chance for Feedback: SOA Tree Proposal
|
Hi Oisin,
Thanks a lot for the detailed comments, my replies inline:
Take another look at the project scope - is there anything
missing there? It kinda reads as if it is to be business as
usual, but in the background section, you mention that
the scope is to be extended. This doesn't gel.
good point, it's basically business as usual, although I suppose the
relation to runtime and deployment will be stronger and the relation
to monitoring is basically new. I will emphasize this in the proposal.
However, on the other hand - "SOA Metamodel Framework"
is a terribly boring name, albeit totally descriptive.
sounds good! Or Maybe "SOA Modelling Framework" instead?
These days things like 'subtitles' are popular for books
(see appalling example at http://tr.im/EddI), because
this is a means to cram in internet search keywords. I
think it sucks for books but it makes sense here.
How about something like "Arbutus - The SOA Metamodel
Framework" or something like that (for Arbutus, just insert
<treename>).
yes, this sort of thing sounds really good now.
I promise that's the last of my comments on naming :)
actually, naming is pretty important, so I'm happy to have all these
discussions and suggestions about naming, and I'm hoping the playful
little contest will yield good results (it's already very
promising :) ).
In the "Roots" section, where it says "common format
that could be based on SCA for instance", I would drop
the "that could be based..." part as it prejudices the
discussion.
sounds good. done.
Double-check your committers list, ensure that all are
good to spend time on the work (of course).
That's it - the sooner we can get this publicised the better.
great, thanks a lot for your suggestions Oisin!
cheers,
Adrian.
