Re: [stp-dev] Draft project proposal Policy Editor

[Gerald Preissler <gerald.preissler@xxxxxxxxx>]

Title: Re: [stp-dev] Draft project proposal Policy Editor

Hi Oisin,

thanks for the feedback, I’ll update the draft accordingly.

For answers to your questions, please see the remarks in the quote below.

Best regards

    Jerry


On 16.12.08 08:25, "Oisin Hurley" <oisin.hurley@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> [..]
> Is there code coming from anywhere else beyond the existing
> code? I had thought that there was some extra stuff somewhere,
> but could be wrong.
GP: We will start building on the existing code, but will add the sample code that is part of the validation framework bugzilla entry rather soon. Would we need an IPZilla for that?

> You can include Progress Software as an 'interested party' in
> your list.
GP: Thanks, will do

> [..]
>
> As a new sub-project you will need a couple of mentors from
> the Architecture council. I can email them when it gets closer
> to the time.
>
> Will you cc the next draft to stp-pmc too, please?
GP: Certainly.
> Isn't there a relationship with WTP as well as the ones that you
> have on the list? The policy code extends the capabilities of
> the WSDL editor as far as I know.
GP: The Policy Editor does not include or use any code from WTP, it merely tries to imitate the look & feel of the WSDL-Editor. Would that constitute a relationship? As an aside, during the GUI walkthrough we found out that maybe the look & feel from the XSD-editor would be more appropriate, so we might switch that. Still WTP, so the question remains.