Ok thx.
I have opened bug https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=359187 for this and had to give it major prio (after considering critical) due to the effect on existing installations.
@igor
We need to see if that stalls our release.
Thomas Menzel @ brox IT-Solutions GmbH
From: smila-user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:smila-user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jürgen Schumacher
Sent: Mittwoch, 28. September 2011 08:48
To: Smila project user mailing list
Subject: Re: [smila-user] smila date value vs. new processing
Hi,
Yes, good point, I was bothered about this myself, but there were other priorities…
I think it should be simple to extend BON to include the type information for string values, and that should solve most problems. I’ll have a look into it when making the specs public, but I’ll also have to do some discussions with colleagues.
I’m not sure yet what we good do about it in JSON. Maybe we could use JSON annotations. I’ll have to take a look into it.
Cheers,
Jürgen.
Hi folks,
The json spec states that dates are converted to strings and if u need dates u convert them urself if needed. I want to use XML anyhow, so no problem, right?
Well, not quite it seems. With the new processing (no AMQ) it seems that internally Json/BON is used and as a consequence I don’t get date values anymore into my pipelines.
Is there any way to preserve the date value as a type? Any tricks?
If not: I think we would need to amend this! After all: what would be the point of the date type then?
Thomas Menzel @ brox IT-Solutions GmbH