[smila-user] smila date value vs. new processing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[smila-user] smila date value vs. new processing

From: Thomas Menzel <tmenzel@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:39:07 +0200
Accept-language: en-US, de-DE
Acceptlanguage: en-US, de-DE
Comment: x-taglocity-tags-start(smila)x-taglocity-tags-end
Delivered-to: smila-user@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/smila-user>
List-help: <mailto:smila-user-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/smila-user>, <mailto:smila-user-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/smila-user>, <mailto:smila-user-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Thread-index: Acx9ImJPDYhref6STduMxrsj55UxRw==
Thread-topic: smila date value vs. new processing

Hi folks,

The json spec states that dates are converted to strings and if u need dates u convert them urself if needed. I want to use XML anyhow, so no problem, right?

Well, not quite it seems. With the new processing (no AMQ) it seems that internally Json/BON is used and as a consequence I don’t get date values anymore into my pipelines.

Is there any way to preserve the date value as a type? Any tricks?

If not: I think we would need to amend this! After all: what would be the point of the date type then?

Thomas Menzel @ brox IT-Solutions GmbH

Taglocity Tags: smila

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [smila-user] smila date value vs. new processing
  - From: Jürgen Schumacher

Prev by Date: [smila-user] 0.9 M1 is out!
Next by Date: [smila-user] spec to BON
Previous by thread: [smila-user] 0.9 M1 is out!
Next by thread: Re: [smila-user] smila date value vs. new processing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs