[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [smila-dev] aperture integration
|
hi antoni,
thx for the prompt answer!
> As I said we expect to make a release "as soon as possible" after the Easter holidays
that sounds really great!
we are planning on a release toward the end of the month. not sure what will all be changing on your end and if we are still able to get that in. but we will certainly strife to do so!
next week I will be on vacation but sebastian voigt will be my backup and hence probably contacting you!
Kind regards
Thomas Menzel @ brox IT-Solutions GmbH
-----Original Message-----
From: smila-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:smila-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Antoni Mylka
Sent: Donnerstag, 9. April 2009 14:51
To: Smila project developer mailing list
Subject: Re: [smila-dev] aperture integration
Thomas Menzel pisze:
> Hi aperture team,
>
>
>
> I have some questions in regard the aperture integration:
>
> · what is the current status ?
In the last month we've been working on splitting Aperture into modules.
This will allow you to get the functionality you need, with the
dependencies you need/can accept. Right now finishing touches are being
applied to the build system. The plan is to have a working osgi-enabled
version this week, and to make a release shortly after the holidays.
> · who is working on this and who is the leading this part?>
I'm working on this (Antoni Mylka/DFKI/Aduna).
> · what is the timeline?
As I said we expect to make a release "as soon as possible" after the
Easter holidays.
> I ask these questions, because aperture is currently not bundled with
> SMILA and hence no integrated solution is available to the public.
>
> However, we from brox, want to build a freely available product
> (eccenca.CE) based on SMILA that will be downloadable from our websites
> and we would like to include aperture into that distribution.
What is your timeline? Is Aperture the only blocker at the moment?
> There has been work done by the SMILA dev. team in respect to
> integrating aperture into SMILA that is located in our svn @
> https://<brox_svn>/svn/eccenca/eccenca/sandbox
> <https://%3cbrox_svn%3e/svn/eccenca/eccenca/sandbox> (originally it was
> in trunk but then moved there).
>
> As far as I know it didn't make it into SMILA due to CQ problems. Until
> the CQ problems are resolved we would like to make the integration
> available under an OSS license (most likely EPL). Later we can mutually
> decide to either hand over that code to SMILA or keep it where it is.
Great. Starting the CQ process will freeze the jars, we won't be able to
change them anymore (e.g fix the manifest headers) so it's a very good
idea to test the entire setup as much as possible.
> Does anybody
>
> · veto that idea ?
Not at all.
> · see problems?
There are quite a lot dependencies. At the moment the full dependency
closure counts about 20 jars from outside Orbit/Aperture/DFKI/Aduna. 3
of them are snapshots. Fortunately the new build setup (50 small
bundles, instead of 3 big ones) will allow for gradual integration.
> · add conditions?
> So long and happy easter.
>
>
>
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards
>
> Thomas Menzel
>
> *brox *IT-Solutions GmbH*
>
Antoni Mylka
antoni.mylka@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
smila-dev mailing list
smila-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/smila-dev
