| AW: [smila-dev] FW: [eclipse.org-committers] Are you interested inOSGi (Equinox) as a server |
|
Hi all, I think that we should stop and postpone any efforts on the
distribution issue (e.g. Tuscany integration). All these technologies sound very interesting and address more
or less the same topics. I agree with Jürgen that using a standard is
preferable. At the moment we can stick to local services (pipelets and
crawlers) and achieve distribution via the Queue. Bye, Daniel Von:
smila-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:smila-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im
Auftrag von Juergen.Schumacher@xxxxxxxxxxx Everything seems to be possible, (-; But I’m not currently not able to state what may be the
best option. If RFC 119 will become part of the OSGi spec., we should certainly
go for something supporting this standard, which would enable hopefully to
exchange the actual implementation. A full implementation of this RFC should
provide both remote communication between OSGi services as well as between
components in different languages. Maybe someday even RIENA will support the
RFC … Cheers, Jürgen. From:
smila-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:smila-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Thomas Menzel i agree, we just had a little bit of a discussion/meeting here and one
scenario we could think feasible is to adopt RIENA for all needs in regard to
remoting for interal components and to use tsuscany for places where we need to
cross language bounderies. do u think that is possible? Kind
regards Thomas Menzel @ brox IT-Solutions GmbH |