I’ve been watching the discussion from the beginning. And I’ll
continue.
The Riena OSGi-service remoting indeed looks interesting and seems
to work quite simply. ECF was a bit hard to understand last time I had a look
at the documentation (which is not very detailed). I hope that they both join
their efforts in this area.
However, it would be only a replacement for remote access to
services, and probably only by clients using the same technology. It would
probably not help with integrating components implemented in other languages
than Java (which was the second use case for Tuscany).
Regards,
Jürgen.
From:
smila-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:smila-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Thomas Menzel
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 1:07 PM
To: Stucky, Daniel, M-ED
Cc: Smila project developer mailing list
Subject: [smila-dev] FW: [eclipse.org-committers] Are you interested in
OSGi (Equinox) as a server
have u had a look at this?
maybe that can be a replacement for Tuscany !?
I know too little of the whole stuff to make a judgement.
Kind
regards
Thomas Menzel @ brox IT-Solutions GmbH
From: eclipse.org-committers-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:eclipse.org-committers-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Joel
Rosi-Schwartz
Sent: Donnerstag, 16. Oktober 2008 14:14
To: eclipse.org-committers@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [eclipse.org-committers] Are you interested in OSGi (Equinox)
as a server
Hi,
This week I started a thread on the eclipse.rt.riena,
eclipse.technology.ormf, eclipse.technology.ecf and eclipse.technology.osee
newsgroups titled "Why are we all creating our own OSGi server
with remoting capability?"
If you are involved in a project that presently requires a
server, will need one in the future or are simply interested in server side
eclipse, please join in the conversation on the newsgroups.
Please note that I am using the terms server and
"server side" generally and do not mean web server in
particular.
P Please
consider the environment before printing this e-mail. Thank you.