Re: [smila-dev] RE: Exception as control flow... nono

[Dmitry Hazin <dhazin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> Hi Dimitry,
>
> thanks for response.
>
> The issue is not in having such a exception. It should not be used as control flow.
>
> Is this behaviour of use?
>   
Yes, invalidate() now uses another way to check that record is not 
loaded into blackboard rather than catching exception.

> The other point is... why does this problem happen in my unit tests?
>
> Is this normal behaviour or do I use the API wrong?
>
> INFO level was not important to me... for me the ERROR and WARN level were important, because a user will expect a problem?
>   
It's normal behavior for those tests that use API in such way. Anyway I 
left warning in the invalidate() method, I think it can be quite 
informative when you really try to invalidate missing record. Probably 
log level can be changed to something like DEBUG.