Re: [rt-pmc] Clarification needed urgently for CQ's regarding Eclipse Ve

["Max Rydahl Andersen" <manderse@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 30 May 2016, at 16:55, Janet Campbell wrote:

> Hi Max,
>
> Julien was informed last week that we would review Vert.x's 
> requirements on
> an expedited basis once he entered the necessary CQs.  It appears that 
> was
> done last Friday - thanks for that.  I don't see any difficulty with 
> meeting
> your objective.

Okey, but in the future for CQ's that are just service release updates,
if I read and understood the resolution we should be able to just open 
the CQ's and
not have to wait for a approval/review.

Can you confirm that is correct ?

Thank you,
/max

> Best regards,
> Janet
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Max Rydahl Andersen [mailto:manderse@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: May-30-16 8:40 AM
> To: emo-ip-team@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Julien Viet <jviet@xxxxxxxxxx>; Runtime Project PMC mailing list
> <rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Clarification needed urgently for CQ's regarding Eclipse 
> Vert.x
> release
>
> Hi emo-ip-team,
>
> (cc'ed Julien, Eclipse vert.x team lead and rt-pmc since this affects 
> them
> directly).
>
> Red Hat requests to have a prioritised up the CQ's for Eclipse Vert.x
> 3.3 release, preferably by end of this week and absolutely on June 8th 
> in
> preparation for release review.
>
> The list are as follows:
>
> - Netty 4.1.0.CR7 -> 4.1.0.Final         :
> https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11509
> - Jackson Core 2.7.3 -> 2.7.4        :
> https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11511
> - Jackson Databind 2.7.3 -> 2.7.4    :
> https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11512
> - Jackson  2.7.3 -> 2.7.4 :
> https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11513
> - Netty Tcnative 1.1.33.Fork15 -> 1.1.33.Fork17 works-with :
> https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11514
>
> Notice, you might find our dates too aggressive, but as you will 
> notice all
> of these dependencies are pure service releases (x.y.* change only) 
> which
> should actually not require any review thus we believe this should be
> trivially fulfilled.
>
> Background:
> Last year at the board meeting 2015-06-22 (minutes here:
> https://eclipse.org/org/foundation/boardminutes/2015_06_22_Minutes.pdf)
> the following resolution:
>
> "RESOLVED, that  previously  approved  dependencies  of  Eclipse 
> projects
> can  be reviewed and approved by the EMO as follows:
> a) Service releases (e.g. x.y.*, bug fixes, security fixes) will 
> require no
> review.
> b) Minor revisions (e.g. x.*.*) will require a reduced review by the 
> EMO.
> c) Major revisions (e.g. *.*.*) will require a full review by the 
> EMO."
>
> The upcoming release for Eclipse Vert.x 3.3 core only have service 
> update to
> its dependencies.
> Red Hat urgently request immediate approval of these CQ's.
>
> If that is not possible then please provide information on how we 
> otherwise
> should interpret that resolution made on the board close to a year 
> ago.
>
> Thank you,
> /max
> http://about.me/maxandersen


/max
http://about.me/maxandersen