Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [rt-pmc] Clarification needed urgently for CQ's regarding Eclipse Vert.x release

Hi Max,

Julien was informed last week that we would review Vert.x's requirements on
an expedited basis once he entered the necessary CQs.  It appears that was
done last Friday - thanks for that.  I don't see any difficulty with meeting
your objective. 

Best regards,
Janet

-----Original Message-----
From: Max Rydahl Andersen [mailto:manderse@xxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: May-30-16 8:40 AM
To: emo-ip-team@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Julien Viet <jviet@xxxxxxxxxx>; Runtime Project PMC mailing list
<rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Clarification needed urgently for CQ's regarding Eclipse Vert.x
release

Hi emo-ip-team,

(cc'ed Julien, Eclipse vert.x team lead and rt-pmc since this affects them
directly).

Red Hat requests to have a prioritised up the CQ's for Eclipse Vert.x
3.3 release, preferably by end of this week and absolutely on June 8th in
preparation for release review.

The list are as follows:

- Netty 4.1.0.CR7 -> 4.1.0.Final         : 
https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11509
- Jackson Core 2.7.3 -> 2.7.4        : 
https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11511
- Jackson Databind 2.7.3 -> 2.7.4    : 
https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11512
- Jackson  2.7.3 -> 2.7.4 : 
https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11513
- Netty Tcnative 1.1.33.Fork15 -> 1.1.33.Fork17 works-with : 
https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11514

Notice, you might find our dates too aggressive, but as you will notice all
of these dependencies are pure service releases (x.y.* change only) which
should actually not require any review thus we believe this should be
trivially fulfilled.

Background:
Last year at the board meeting 2015-06-22 (minutes here: 
https://eclipse.org/org/foundation/boardminutes/2015_06_22_Minutes.pdf)
the following resolution:

"RESOLVED, that  previously  approved  dependencies  of  Eclipse projects
can  be reviewed and approved by the EMO as follows:
a) Service releases (e.g. x.y.*, bug fixes, security fixes) will require no
review.
b) Minor revisions (e.g. x.*.*) will require a reduced review by the EMO.
c) Major revisions (e.g. *.*.*) will require a full review by the EMO."

The upcoming release for Eclipse Vert.x 3.3 core only have service update to
its dependencies.
Red Hat urgently request immediate approval of these CQ's.

If that is not possible then please provide information on how we otherwise
should interpret that resolution made on the board close to a year ago.

Thank you,
/max
http://about.me/maxandersen



Back to the top