[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [rt-pmc] ECF 3.6.0 release review
|
Hi Scott
Actually my recollection was that it is only necessary to pass the material by the PMC for comments. But when I checked the release review documentation on the wiki, it still seemed to require formal approval by the PMC. I must have been dreaming.
But I didn't see any special rules about voting. Perhaps there are some generic PMC voting rules (but http://wiki.eclipse.org/PMC doesn't seem to mention any)?
Wayne: please could you advise what constitutes PMC approval of release docuware?
Regards,
Glyn
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Scott Lewis" <slewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Wednesday, 27 February, 2013 5:55:37 AM
> Subject: Re: [rt-pmc] ECF 3.6.0 release review
>
> Thanks Glyn for the quick response.
>
> I'm not sure of current protocol...do I need more than one PMC approval
> to have the EF consider it 'pmc approved'?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Scott
>
> On 2/26/2013 3:57 AM, Glyn Normington wrote:
> > Hi Scott
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Regards,
> > Glyn
> >
> > On 26 Feb 2013, at 02:00, Scott Lewis <slewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> ECF would like to have a 3.6.0 release on March 11, 2013, and we've
> >> created review slides in prep for the EF review here [1].
> >>
> >> RT PMC approval for the review and release would be appreciated.
> >>
> >> Thanksinadvance,
> >>
> >> Scott
> >>
> >> [1]
> >> http://www.eclipse.org/ecf/reviews/ECF_Project_3.6.0_Release_Review.pdf
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> rt-pmc mailing list
> >> rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
> > _______________________________________________
> > rt-pmc mailing list
> > rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-pmc mailing list
> rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
>
