[rt-pmc] [CQ 3932] activation-1.1.jar Version: duplication of package (P

[emo-ip-team@xxxxxxxxxxx]

http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3932


Jesse McConnell <jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx




--- Comment #3 from Jesse McConnell <jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx>  2010-04-13 09:08:53 ---
Couple of questions on this CQ

1) Is there any reason that the actual activation 1.1 bundle in orbit could not
be used in place of this bundle?  This bundle contains both com.sun and
javax.activation source in it...is it modified from its original version in
some way that would prevent the reuse?

2) what namespace would you be using this under?  talking with jeff this
morning he mentioned that the spring source strategy has been to bundle these
sorts of things under a new namespace, but the eclipse way has been to bundle
in place and be happy if the originator started producing bundles...  I believe
this means that ideally virgo would use the bundle javax.activation in this
case as opposed to com.springsource.javax.activation

So is there a technical reason behind requiring this CQ, like modification of
the source or a bugfix or is there another reason preventing usage of the
original javax.activation bundles?

cheers!
jesse


-- 
Configure CQmail: http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the CQ.