Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [rdf4j-dev] RDF4J 5.0 milestone build

I know I said I'd be inactive, but... Is there any work that needs to be done to complete the work on moving to the new vocabulary for configs (the tag URIs)? Reason I ask is that I know we had to partially roll that back for the 4.3 release, and I haven't had a chance yet to see what it looks like in the 5.0 branch - if anything needs to be re-added or re-tested? 

If so, I'll try and find some time this weekend to do some of that - given it's a mess I created I feel obligated to clean it up and get it done :)

Jeen

On Wed, 26 Jul 2023, at 19:40, Håvard Ottestad via rdf4j-dev wrote:
Hi Andreas,

It would be great if you can test the milestone build in your product once it's available.

Our initial timeline for 5.0 was to have it ready for release now in the summer. We are obviously not going to make that.

I can propose a new timeline:
- 5.0.0-M1 within the next 1-2 weeks
- new milestone builds when we have breaking changes or major new features to test
- 5.0.0 release within the 3-6 months.

I took a look though the notes from the RDF4J Planning Session in September 2022. Two features stick out:
1. Support for JSON-LD 1.1
2. Updated RDF-Star implementation

At the moment I don't believe that anyone is working on this. For JSON-LD 1.1 we would be swapping to the Titanium library. I don't know how much work that would take. For RDF-Star I assume we would be modifying our implementation to match the RDF-star and SPARQL-star Final Community Group Report 17 December 2021, which is the latest I could find.

For RDF-Star we might want to keep the old implementation around for legacy support since I believe the latest "standard" has some breaking changes.

Cheers,
Håvard


> On 26 Jul 2023, at 08:14, Andreas Schwarte via rdf4j-dev <rdf4j-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Håvard,

> thanks a lot for driving this.

> I have been following the recent changes (though I unfortunately currenty do not have much time to get actively involved). Especially for the iteration cleanup I am really looking forward to have it - but more from the technical point of view to get rid of all the deprecation warnings in my IDE.

> I like the idea of the snapshot, and can offer that we validate it in our product during our usual development phase. With this we will likely identify gaps or issues.

> Can you remind me again about the currently planned release timeline for 5.0?

> Thanks,
>  Andreas



> Am 22.07.2023 um 22:57 schrieb Håvard Ottestad via rdf4j-dev:
>> Hi Everyone!
>> 
>> I'm planning on creating the first milestone build of our upcoming major release, 5.0.
>> 
>> I want to include as many breaking changes as I can, so we can get some early feedback.
>> 
>> I'm currently planning on going through and removing code marked as both deprecated and for removal. I also have a PR with the removal of the Iteration interface that I would like to include.
>> 
>> I'll take a look at our open PRs, but please tag me if you know of anything that is ready to be included in the milestone build.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Håvard
>> _______________________________________________
>> rdf4j-dev mailing list
>> rdf4j-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rdf4j-dev

> _______________________________________________
> rdf4j-dev mailing list
rdf4j-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rdf4j-dev

_______________________________________________
rdf4j-dev mailing list
rdf4j-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rdf4j-dev



Back to the top