[qvto-dev] Issue 13268: Ordered Tuples .was: QVT 1.2 RTF Ballot 1 previe

[Adolfo Sanchez-Barbudo Herrera <adolfosbh@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi

For allusions in the document. In issue 13268:

OCL Tuples contain named tuple parts. The operation's returned tuples 
for multiple results can't deal with named tuple parts.  Note that 
having multiple results, is different to have a single result whose type 
may be an OCL Tuple, which is of course accepted/valid.

Precisely, OrderedTuples (and other concepts like UnpackExp) are 
required/introduced in QVTo to deal with operations with multiple results.

I doubt that normal OCL tuples can similarly deal with this issue, what 
respects to UML operations.

It could be arguable that the clarification of "ordered tuple" is 
needed. Given the current resolution of this issue, the clarification is 
clearly required.

Minor extra:
- The section number (from the issue title) has changed from 8.2.1.11 to 
8.2.1.12 (in QVT 1.1)

Regards,
Adolfo.
--
On 31/12/2013 13:27, Ed Willink wrote:
> Hi
>
> The first preview of QVT 1.2 RTF Ballot 1 is attached.
>
> Preview 1-Jan to 8-Jan
> Voting 8-Jan to 22-Jan
>
> The resolutions in this ballot are mostly the oldest (so mostly QVTc),
> or most controversial. QVTo-only reviewers may prefer to look at the
> No-Changes.
>
> All working material may be found at
> http://svn.omg.org/repos/QVT/trunk/Documents/TaskForces/1.2. Apply to
> Juergen for a password, and beware of using SVN 1.8 tooling for the 1.4
> server (1.7 seems fine).
>
> Most of the resolutions for Ballot 2 and 3 can be found in
> QVT1.2RTFBallotAll.odt.
>
> I do not feel confident enough to address the following so they will be
> deferred unless someone comes up with the bulk of a resolution proposal.
> i.e. discussion and editorial changes.
>
> http://www.omg.org/issues/qvt-rtf.open.html#Issue12370
> http://www.omg.org/issues/qvt-rtf.open.html#Issue13082
> http://www.omg.org/issues/qvt-rtf.open.html#Issue13103
> http://www.omg.org/issues/qvt-rtf.open.html#Issue13168
> http://www.omg.org/issues/qvt-rtf.open.html#Issue13180
> http://www.omg.org/issues/qvt-rtf.open.html#Issue15376
> http://www.omg.org/issues/qvt-rtf.open.html#Issue15390
> http://www.omg.org/issues/qvt-rtf.open.html#Issue17538
> http://www.omg.org/issues/qvt-rtf.open.html#Issue18323
> http://www.omg.org/issues/qvt-rtf.open.html#Issue18324
> http://www.omg.org/issues/qvt-rtf.open.html#Issue18325
> http://www.omg.org/issues/qvt-rtf.open.html#Issue18363
>
>      Regards
>
>          Ed Willink
>
> On 28/12/2013 13:17, Ed Willink wrote:
> > Please reply to this email to confirm that you are able to participate
> > in the ballots (and identify any resolutions you feel able to write).
> No replies. I hope you're all enjoying a long break.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> qvto-dev mailing list
> qvto-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/qvto-dev