I agree, it makes sense for PTP and Photran to switch at the same
time for consistency.
+1 for keeping the repo open for direct commits. It will be good to
have the flexibility to either use or bypass Gerrit, depending on
the situation.
Jeff
On 6/21/13 10:39 AM, Greg Watson wrote:
Unless someone object, I think all projects should switch.
Greg
Does Photran want to switch to Gerrit
at the same date?
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:04 PM,
Zhi Ming BJ Wang <wangzm@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
A training is very good.
I'm looking forward to a
training about how to use Eclipse PTP to improve
practices for MPI program.
Best Regards,
Zhi Ming Wang 王志明
-------------------------------------------------------------
Software Engineer, IBM Platform-MPI
China Systems & Technology Laboratory, STG,
IBM GCG
Phone:86-10-82450405
E-mail:wangzm@xxxxxxxxxx
![Inactive hide
details for "Alameda, Jay" ---2013/06/20
23:12:32---I would like "training" on
this as well, I'm interested in no]() "Alameda, Jay" ---2013/06/20
23:12:32---I would like "training" on this as
well, I'm interested in not only our use for
Eclipse purposes, bu
From:
"Alameda,
Jay" <alameda@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:
Parallel
Tools Platform general developers <ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Date:
2013/06/20
23:12
Subject:
Re:
[ptp-dev] Gerrit
Sent
by: ptp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
I would like
“training” on this as well, I’m interested in not
only our use for Eclipse purposes, but also more
generally, especially for improving practices for
application software engineers using Eclipse PTP
for their work – (could become another module in
our tutorial suite).
From: ptp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ptp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Beth Tibbitts
Sent: Thursday,
June 20, 2013 10:03 AM
To: Parallel
Tools Platform general developers
Subject: Re:
[ptp-dev] Gerrit
Can we have
some 'training' and have some suggested workflows
and ways to do things so that everyone learns how
to do it the same way?
On Thu, Jun
20, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Greg Watson <g.watson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Roland,
I'm ok with this. I think initially I'd like to
keep the repo open for direct commits. Once we get
used to using gerrit we can revisit make reviews
mandatory.
Please open the bug.
Greg
On Jun 19, 2013, at 10:08 PM, Roland Schulz <roland@xxxxxxx
> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> could we enable Gerrit for PTP:
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Gerrit? The
> only effect for committers is that they
need to update their git url
> for fetch/push once. Otherwise all git
operations would stay the same.
> The advantage would be that we could have
contributors upload patches
> directly from git (no need to make patches
and upload them manually to
> bugzilla). Also it would allow any
committer (who wishes to use it) to
> use it for code review. E.g. John and me
like to do code review at
> least for important commits and currently
we need to do that
> externally (we use github).
>
> Roland
>
> --
> ORNL/UT Center for Molecular Biophysics
cmb.ornl.gov
> _______________________________________________
> ptp-dev mailing list
> ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
--
ORNL/UT Center for Molecular Biophysics cmb.ornl.gov
865-241-1537, ORNL PO BOX 2008 MS6309
_______________________________________________
ptp-dev mailing list
ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev
_______________________________________________
ptp-dev mailing list
ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev
|
