[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [ptp-dev] PTP vs CDT main launch tab
|
Wyatt,
The main differences between PTP and CDT launch are in how the
application and the debugger are started. These happen in completely
different ways for PTP and CDT. Also, we've disabled a lot of the
binary file checking to handle remote launching, since the executable
may not exist locally (or may be in a different location).
Having said that, if the same result can be achieved by extending
CDT's launch configuration then I would support that approach. Randy
may have a better idea of what would be required for 2.0 since he's
working on that at the moment.
Greg
On Apr 9, 2007, at 1:31 PM, wspear wrote:
Greetings,
Is there a reason the PTP's main launch configuration tab's
implementation is so distinct from the CDT's? For PTP 1.1 it seems
like they both attempt to provide similar functionality and that
the PTP tab could easily be an extension of the CDT tab. The most
significant differences seem to be that the CDT implements stricter
control of binary-file selection and requires the inclusion of some
CDT-specific packages. Unless the current PTP main tab is
necessarily different or PTP 2's main tab is going to have
significantly different requirements I think I could submit a patch
that merges them without too much difficulty.
This is relevant to the TAU plugins in that I am altering the main
tabs for the user to select a build configuration rather than a
binary, since the plugins don't run preexisting executables
anyway. If the PTP's differences from the CDT are necessary I will
extend the PTP tab separately, otherwise I'll reuse the extension I
made to the CDT main tab.
Thanks,
Wyatt
_______________________________________________
ptp-dev mailing list
ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev
