Re: [platform-swt-dev] MacOS X port status?

["Mike Wilson/OTT/OTI" <Mike_Wilson@xxxxxxx>]

FWIW, I believe that the Carbon based approach is likely to be a "closest match" to what the current SWT shape is. (note: I'm not claiming it's the *right* approach). I haven't voted "+1" for it however, since I don't actually believe I can commit a useful amount of time to the effort.

McQ.

ilyanov@xxxxxxx Sent by: platform-swt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx 11/22/2001 03:34 PM Please respond to platform-swt-dev

To:        platform-swt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx         cc:                 Subject:        Re: [platform-swt-dev] MacOS X port status?

Hi Ringo,

I am just waiting till the week end before we tally up the vote. It 
seems there is substantial interest in doing the CarbonSWT port. However 
I do feel that Cocoa is an option that should be considered. I think we 
need to work out the details of how the two approaches would map to SWT 
and conclude firmly which approach is the best. I still do feel that 
Carbon would map best to SWT. And I am willing to devote time (a day or 
two a week) to detailing how well it maps. Could some one else do the 
same for Cocoa?

Cheers
Suhail

On Thursday, November 22, 2001, at 05:54  PM, Ringo De Smet wrote:

> Hello fellow MacOS X enthusiasts,
>
> It has been very quite lately concerning a possible MacOS X port. Has 
> the discussions moved to somewhere else? What are the results of the 
> voting? We still have to choose a project lead. Come on guys, let's 
> pick this up again...
>
> Ringo
>
> _______________________________________________
> platform-swt-dev mailing list
> platform-swt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-swt-dev

_______________________________________________
platform-swt-dev mailing list
platform-swt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-swt-dev