Re: [platform-releng-dev] Performance re-testing on releases and 3.1 mi

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [platform-releng-dev] Performance re-testing on releases and 3.1 milestones

From: Andre Weinand <eclipse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 13:46:15 +0200
Delivered-to: platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <http://eclipse.org/pipermail/platform-releng-dev>
List-help: <mailto:platform-releng-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-releng-dev>, <mailto:platform-releng-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-releng-dev>, <mailto:platform-releng-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

At 10:56 Uhr +0200 13.4.2005, Tobias Widmer wrote:

I have a question regarding the measure used in the assertions. Ifwe do not explicitly specify whether to take CPU Time or ElapsedProcess, which one is used as default?


Performance.assertPerformance(PerformanceMeter) asserts that
CPU_TIME is in between -100% and +10%

--andre

References:
- Re: [platform-releng-dev] Performance re-testing on releases and 3.1 milestones
  - From: Tobias Widmer

Prev by Date: [platform-releng-dev] [eclipse-build]Build N20050413-0010 (Timestamp: 200504130010):Automated JUnit testing complete. Test failures/errors occurred.
Next by Date: Re: [platform-releng-dev] [eclipse-build]Build I20050412-1547 (Timestamp: 200504121547):Automated JUnit testing complete. Test failures/errors occurred.
Previous by thread: Re: [platform-releng-dev] Performance re-testing on releases and 3.1 milestones
Next by thread: [platform-releng-dev] [eclipse-build]Build I20050412-1547 (Timestamp: 200504121547):Automated JUnit testing complete. Test failures/errors occurred.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs