[platform-dev] SonarQube Configuration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[platform-dev] SonarQube Configuration

From: Karsten Thoms <thoms@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 13:49:57 +0200
Delivered-to: platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/platform-dev>
List-help: <mailto:platform-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-dev>, <mailto:platform-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/platform-dev>, <mailto:platform-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

I have started to raise Bugzilla requests to optimise the SonarQube rules configuration. I believe that some rules are of no value for certain file patterns and just distracting from real issues. With your input we could make more use of the SonarQube reports and concentrate on fixing issues detected by it. I posted already on cross-dev, but without reaction so far.

[1] Bug#522282 - [sonar] Change rules for Message classes

[2] Bug#522285 - [sonar] Exclude generated EMF Package/Factory Impl classes

[3] Bug#522482 - [sonar] Change rules for Test classes

~Karsten

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [platform-dev] SonarQube Configuration
  - From: Christian Pontesegger
- Re: [platform-dev] SonarQube Configuration
  - From: Lars Vogel

Prev by Date: Re: [platform-dev] [platform-ui-dev] Oxygen 1a and R4_7_maintenance
Next by Date: Re: [platform-dev] SonarQube Configuration
Previous by thread: [platform-dev] Welcome Noopur Gupta as a new eclipse.platform Committer
Next by thread: Re: [platform-dev] SonarQube Configuration
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs