Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [platform-debug-dev] Build notes policy for 3.6 development

The bug should be assigned to the person who fixes or is fixing the bug.  It doens't cause problems, but can make bug searching easier.

Curtis




From: Pawel Piech <pawel.piech@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Eclipse Platform Debug component developers list." <platform-debug-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2009/06/22 04:41 PM
Subject: Re: [platform-debug-dev] Build notes policy for 3.6 development





I have another question about process.  I see that we're now using the
review flag to request a review to verify a bug.  Is it OK to leave the
bug assigned to the inbox, or should the person fixing the bug take it
first?
Cheers,
Pawel

Darin Wright wrote:
> Developers,
>
> Historically we have maintained a detailed list of fixed bugs, new
> features and API changes/additions in
> "/org.eclipse.debug.core/buildnotes_platform-debug.html". Moving forward
> for 3.6, I propose that we continue to add notes describing new features
> and API changes/additions, but not bother with a detailed list of fixed
> bugs. Fixed bugs are better queried from bugzilla.
>
> If you have any objections, please discuss.
>
> Darin
> _______________________________________________
> platform-debug-dev mailing list
> platform-debug-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-debug-dev
>  

_______________________________________________
platform-debug-dev mailing list
platform-debug-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-debug-dev



Back to the top