Re: [platform-debug-dev] AsynchronousTreeViewer and IMemoryBlockRetrieva

[Darin Wright <Darin_Wright@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> 
> As to distinguish what classes and interfaces are going to be public,
I do
> not think we have a systematic way of doing it.  Maybe what we
need is to
> update the java docs and mark the internal APIs as "experimental"?
> 

The debug platform also needs to distinguish what
classes/interfaces we intend to become API in a later release, regarding
flexible hierachy support. We should create new packages for experimental
classes intended to become API. I believe the evolving standard is to use
"provisional" packages - i.e. something like 'org.eclipse.debug.ui.provisional.viewers'.
I need to find out if the 'internal' identifier should still be used.

Darin