Re: [platform-debug-dev] AsynchronousTreeViewer and IMemoryBlockRetrieva

[Samantha Chan <chanskw@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Mikhail -

There is now a bug entry for this work item:  : )
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=122349

I believe extending from platform's debug target content adapter should be
the right solution.

As to distinguish what classes and interfaces are going to be public, I do
not think we have a systematic way of doing it.  Maybe what we need is to
update the java docs and mark the internal APIs as "experimental"?

Thanks...
Samantha



                                                                           
             "Mikhail                                                      
             Khodjaiants"                                                  
             <mikhailk@xxxxxxx                                          To 
             >                         "Eclipse Platform Debug component   
             Sent by:                  developers list."                   
             platform-debug-de         <platform-debug-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>    
             v-bounces@eclipse                                          cc 
             .org                                                          
                                                                   Subject 
                                       Re: [platform-debug-dev]            
             12/29/2005 04:58          AsynchronousTreeViewer   and        
             PM                        IMemoryBlockRetrieval               
                                                                           
                                                                           
             Please respond to                                             
             "Eclipse Platform                                             
              Debug component                                              
             developers list."                                             
                                                                           
                                                                           




Samantha,

> One of the things on my to-do list is to remove the requirement of
> passing
> IMemoryBlockRetrieval object to the tree viewer as the input.

Is there a bugzilla entry for it?

Thanks,
Mikhail

----- Original Message -----
From: "Samantha Chan" <chanskw@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Eclipse Platform Debug component developers list."
<platform-debug-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 10:00 AM
Subject: Re: [platform-debug-dev] AsynchronousTreeViewer and
IMemoryBlockRetrieval


> Hi -
>
> One of the things on my to-do list is to remove the requirement of
> passing
> IMemoryBlockRetrieval object to the tree viewer as the input.  Instead,
> the
> current debug context will be passed as the input to the viewer.  It's
> up
> to the content adapter of that object to retrieve the correct
> IMemoryBlockRetrieval and associated memory blocks when asked to
> populate
> the view.  This approach will make the viewer more flexible as any
> object
> can now become the input to the viewer.  It also removes the needs of
> making IMemoryBlockRetrieval an IAdaptable.
>
> So, for the modules view, is it possible for your viewer to accept any
> object as input.  And then the content adapter of that object will be
> responsible for getting the modules?
>
> Thanks...
> Samantha
>
>
>
>
>
>              "Mikhail
>
>              Khodjaiants"
>
>              <mikhailk@xxxxxxx
> To
>              >                         <platform-debug-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>              Sent by:
> cc
>              platform-debug-de
>
>              v-bounces@eclipse
> Subject
>              .org                      [platform-debug-dev]
>
>                                        AsynchronousTreeViewer and
>
>                                        IMemoryBlockRetrieval
>
>              12/28/2005 02:49
>
>              PM
>
>
>
>
>
>              Please respond to
>
>              "Eclipse Platform
>
>               Debug component
>
>              developers list."
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> An IMemoryBlockRetrieval object is passed to the Memory view's viewer as
> an
> input. This object is required to be an instanceof of IAdaptable to work
> with AsynchronousTreeViewer.
> The IMemoryBlockRetrieval interface defines a functionality, not a model
> object and I am not sure if it is right to make it adaptable.
> I implemented the CDT Modules view based on the asynchronous tree
> viewer,
> but I had the same problem - I had to make the object responsible for
> the
> modules retrieval to extend PlatformObject.
>
> Thanks,
> Mikhail Khodjaiants
> QNX Software Systems _______________________________________________
> platform-debug-dev mailing list
> platform-debug-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-debug-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> platform-debug-dev mailing list
> platform-debug-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-debug-dev

_______________________________________________
platform-debug-dev mailing list
platform-debug-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-debug-dev