Gunnar Wagenknecht wrote:
Bjorn
and Nathan, I appreciate your feedback. But you are mixing up different
shoes here. CVS source code is available as well as the source of
Bugzilla, Drupal, Mediawiki and the Planet Eclipse feed parser
(including our additions to it).
Not the exact version of Bugzilla and Mediawiki that we are running :-)
(We've hacked the sources of both of those tools a bit.)
BTW,
I also don't understand why the EPIC source is also not public
available. From my understanding it has been contributed back in 2006
including a set of initial committers to move the code over to Phoenix
(http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/phoenix-dev/msg00392.html).
Because the EPIC source had some GPL'ed code and we do not distribute
GPL'ed code from eclipse.org and making the sources available is
"distributing".
I'm
not asking you to go through all the administration overhead and setup
an Eclipse project (well, we already have Phoenix) or go through the IP
process. (Note, I've heard rumors that this was used as an argument
before.) There are alternatives (like Google Code or SourceForge).
The Eclipse Foundation has no plans to use a non-Eclipse distribution
site (SourceForge or Google Code) to distribute code.
Am
I the only one thinking this way?
You're not the only one, but you're also talking to the wrong forum.
The Phoenix project is an open source Eclipse project that contains the
contents of the www.eclipse.org website. The Phoenix project does not
contain the portal, live, or other eclipse.org websites. The decision
to open source (or not) those other eclipse.org websites is, in the
end, made by the Executive Director, not by the Phoenix project team.
- Bjorn
--
[end of message]
|