Regarding your suggestions to move
forward, why is it not good enough to have the discussion on a public mailing
list?
I'm confused - isn't this (phoenix-dev) a public
mailing list?
>> Yes it is public and that is the
point I was trying to make. In your original criteria to remove your veto,
you required everything to be done through bugzilla. My point is that we
should also be able to use the mailing list, since it is public.
Regardless, here is what I believe Nathan
has done and I believe it is available for all to review.
2. Denis is out of the office but he did
check-in the code for the updates Nathan did to these pages: http://www.eclipse.org/community/rcp.php,
http://www.eclipse.org/community/rcpos.php,
http://www.eclipse.org/community/rcpcp.php.
I also reviewed these pages before they were checked in.
But until you said this on this list, nobody except
you and Denis knew this, right? So it wasn't done in public.
>>>> Ok, but now that I have
said it, does that count as being public and for your criteria?
3. Nathan has been working
with Susan on the RSS feeds and a community bulletin. One example
is http://www.eclipse.org/org/press-release/20060309cb_elections.php.
But again, the work wasn't done in public.
>>>
But now it is, via this mailing list, so does that count?
4. Nathan will be doing a number of pages
for the Eclipse Awards. I will review them and commit them next
week. Unfortunately they can not go public until March 21, for obvious
reasons.
P.S. You realize that if you commit them next week they become public, right?
Because the CVS is publically readable.
>>>> Yes and probably another
reason why we are not going to use bugzilla.
I understand that you are frustrated. The bar is being raised (back to
where it once was) for all the projects.
>>> You are correct I am frustrated. I agree with
raising the bar but this just sounds like bad process that is adding no value.