Re: [pde-dev] 0 for Peter Nehrer on eclipse.pde by John Arthorne

["Curtis Windatt" <Curtis_Windatt@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I think that is a reasonable course of
action.  It is important that Peter is added as a committer to support
and evolve the DS annotation support in PDE.  However, that contribution
has not been reviewed and merged as of yet.  In the new year we will
restart the process.

Curtis



From:      
 "Daniel Megert"
<daniel_megert@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:      
 "Eclipse PDE general
developers list." <pde-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, pnehrer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date:      
 12/17/2015 10:34 AM
Subject:    
   Re: [pde-dev]
0 for Peter Nehrer on eclipse.pde by John Arthorne
Sent by:    
   pde-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

I agree with John here.

It is really great news that Peter wants to contribute towards the DS component
in PDE on a longer term, and I definitely look forward to those contributions!

On the other hand, this nomination came a bit too early. According to the
Eclipse
Development Process's Committers and Contributors sectionand
the Guidelines
for Nominating and Electing a New Committerthe
most important criteria is that the candidate has built trust among the
current committers. In this case the nomination is based on a single Gerrit
change which does not even
have a code-review +1 from a committer, and there are no other commits
over the past several years (there were two commits in 2008).

I would like to ask to withdraw this election and have Peter earn his commit
rights like everyone else did before. If his big change makes it into the
code base, and he follows the community for few weeks, we can restart the
vote based on the trust we gained.

Dani



From:        portal-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxx
(portal on behalf of )
To:        pde-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date:        17.12.2015
15:49
Subject:        [pde-dev]
0 for Peter Nehrer on eclipse.pde by John Arthorne
Sent by:        pde-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

John Arthorne voted:
   0
Peter\'s contribution and offer to support it are great news. I find it
odd
to support a committer vote before he has had a single commit accepted
on
the project though, so I\'m voting 0.

Voting summary: http://portal.eclipse.org/


_______________________________________________
pde-dev mailing list
pde-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pde-dev


_______________________________________________
pde-dev mailing list
pde-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pde-dev