Re: [pde-dev] 0 for Peter Nehrer on eclipse.pde by John Arthorne

["Daniel Megert" <daniel_megert@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I agree with John here.

It is really great news that Peter wants
to contribute towards the DS component in PDE on a longer term, and I definitely
look forward to those contributions!

On the other hand, this nomination came
a bit too early. According to the Eclipse
Development Process's Committers and Contributors sectionand the Guidelines
for Nominating and Electing a New Committerthe most important criteria is that the candidate has built trust among
the current committers. In this case the nomination is based on a single
Gerrit
change which does not even have
a code-review +1 from a committer, and there are no other commits over
the past several years (there were two commits in 2008).

I would like to ask to withdraw this
election and have Peter earn his commit rights like everyone else did before.
If his big change makes it into the code base, and he follows the community
for few weeks, we can restart the vote based on the trust we gained.

Dani



From:      
 portal-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxx
(portal on behalf of )
To:      
 pde-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date:      
 17.12.2015 15:49
Subject:    
   [pde-dev] 0
for Peter Nehrer on eclipse.pde by John Arthorne
Sent by:    
   pde-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

John Arthorne voted:
    0
Peter\'s contribution and offer to support it are great news. I find it
odd
to support a committer vote before he has had a single commit accepted
on
the project though, so I\'m voting 0.

Voting summary: http://portal.eclipse.org/


_______________________________________________
pde-dev mailing list
pde-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pde-dev