Re: [pde-dev] Bugs

[Curtis Windatt <Curtis_Windatt@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Stefan,

I am aware of bug 351417 and have looked
at the patch.  In fact the bug has been on my TODO list for some time.
 However I have my own priority items and there isn't anyone familiar
with both p2 and PDE to review the impact of the change.  I am concerned
that adding the configure phase will impact other use cases as targets
are not expected to be a runnable products (as was already discussed on
the bug).  One option would be to have a configurable setting, but
I don't know where to place it in a way that anyone but a p2 guru will
really understand what it is for.

I will find some time to investigate
further early in M4 after bug 347695 (target UI API).

Curtis Windatt

From:	"Dimov, Stefan" <stefan.dimov@xxxxxxx>
To:	"pde-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx" <pde-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Date:	2011/10/21 02:19 AM
Subject:	[pde-dev] Bugs
Sent by:	pde-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

Hi all,
 
The (SAP) team I’m working in is implementing
some proprietary plugins and we’ve met some problems which resulted in
bugs in the Eclipse bugzilla. We’ve proposed some patches, which are waiting
for approval. We already have three bugs/patches in different WTP subprojects
plus one in PDE project. 
 
It’s not that the bugs have been pending
for too long, but the problem here is that all of them are blockers for
our team work and since they are already four it really becomes a huge
blocker.
 
I (on behalf of my team) want to kindly
ask you for a bit of your attention on the PDE bug in order to unblock
our work. We
would really appreciate it. (I already wrote an e-mail to ‘wtp-dev’ mailing
list for the WTP related bugs.)  
 
The bug I’m talking about is:
 
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=351417
 
Thanks in advance!
Stefan Dimov
 _______________________________________________
pde-dev mailing list
pde-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pde-dev