[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
[pde-dev] Incorrect CVS details, project summary, etc.
|
I'm currently creating a build-script to create Ubuntu/Debian Eclipse
packages from CVS sources. I've been hindered by a lack of correct
project documentation, especially relating to the correct CVS location.
The project summary
http://www.eclipse.org/projects/project_summary.php?projectid=eclipse.pde
shows a list of components with links, most of which return a 404 Not
Found error. The sub-projects links also give either a bad response or
apparently out-of-date information.
(These problems carry forward to the PDE 'home' and related pages, too.
For example, the PDE-UI Getting Involved page:
http://www.eclipse.org/pde/pde-ui/get_involved.php )
The project summary page also contains a list of CVS URIs that are for
the old /cvsroot/eclipse location with no indication the project has
relocated.
The link to cvsweb ("browseable on the web") goes to the *old* viewcvs
location with no obvious way to access the new CVS location.
I dug around in the old org.eclipse.pde.* modules and eventually found
in /cvsroot/eclipse/org.eclipse.pde.api.tools/readme.txt
http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/index.cgi/org.eclipse.pde.api.tools/readme.txt?view=markup
that it says the project has moved to:
dev.eclipse.org:/cvsroot/eclipse/pde
By guessing and typing random URLs I *think* I've found it via viewcvs
at:
http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/index.cgi/pde/
However, trying to use a CVS client fails to find this repository:
cvs -d :pserver:anonymous@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/cvsroot/eclipse/pde checkout apitools
cvs [checkout aborted]: unrecognized auth response from dev.eclipse.org:
cvs [pserver aborted]: /cvsroot/eclipse/pde: no such repository
A similar checkout attempt for the RT repo is successful
(:pserver:anonymous@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/cvsroot/rt)
Would it be possible to update and correct the various pages (and all
the old repo modules) to make it easier for new-comers to discover the
new location easily?
Thanks.