David's reasoning makes sense given where
the project is. I also suggest one list for now. We can adjust later if
it becomes a problem, (e.g. with indicators in subject line).
David M Williams/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
discussions for paho project <paho-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
03/09/2012 02:45 PM
Paho: MQTT C client code available
My advise ... stick with one list until or if it just gets too busy and
cluttered with vastly separate topics and a very different group of people.
Hopefully titles will be specific enough that people would know which to
skip/skim read and which interested them in detail. Having one list per
project is easier for Eclipse webmasters to administer, easier for users
find, improves things like searching for a topic months later, prevents
"general" topic of interest to all accidentally get started (or
into general topic) on the wrong list, etc. ... and who knows ... there
might be some C and Java/OSGi overlap? :)
Raymond Auge <raymond.auge@xxxxxxxxxxx>
General development discussions for paho project
03/09/2012 02:18 PM
Re: [paho-dev] Paho: MQTT C client code available
Patiently awaiting the java code as I'm about as skill in C as I am in
Regarding discussions on language specifics, will it all be conducted under
this one list?
For example I'd like to eventually discuss the java client details of OSGi
support. Such a topic is likely of no interest to developers
languages. Will that matter? Does anyone care?
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Andy Piper <andypiperuk@xxxxxxxxx>
Great stuff. Now, if only we had a make target that would let me
on OS Xâ :-)