[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [p2-dev] Misc Live 3 results, with custom optimization criteria
- From: Jeff McAffer <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 11:12:56 -0500
- Delivered-to: email@example.com
Thanks for the pointer Pascal. I personally think the results are better than "not bad". Speed is interesting but our usecases are more interested in correctness IMHO. A quick scan of result show that we either tie or are not far off in the majority of cases. Well done to the competition team.
On 2010-12-23, at 6:00 PM, Daniel Le Berre wrote:
> Dear all,
> The results of the third informal comparison of dependency resolver for
> Linux (MISC Live 3) have been disclosed a few days ago.
> The results are here:
> The results of p2 during that event were not bad, considering that the
> other competitors are using plain C/C++ resolvers.
> (the lower the score, the better, ties broken using running time)
> The nice feature of that third evaluation is that it contains user
> defined optimization functions:
> The version of p2 with custom opt function capability is available as
> part of p2cudf:
> Daniel Le Berre mailto:leberre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> MCF-HDR, CRIL-CNRS UMR 8188, Universite d'Artois
> p2-dev mailing list