[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [orbit-dev] Declaring Build: I20120509234235 -- ready for RC1?

I would suggest you create the bugzillas with the RC2 target, and leave a comment "tentatively planned for RC2" pending approval of CQ xyz"

That way, people can get an idea of what still might be coming. Then if it need to slip past RC2, I think we should have the discussion then ... is it worth waiting to for list of bugzillas or CQs or should we just go ahead and decide its too late.

One of the factors, for example, would be that if its a "rare" 3rd party library used only by one or a couple of projects, then that's one thing. If its something more "mainstream" that might be used or "picked up accidentally" by many projects, then I don't think there would be sufficient time to test, and they'd be better off in SR1, or something

Hope that helps. I'll look forward to the list!



Inactive hide details for "Kirchev, Lazar" ---05/11/2012 06:06:20 AM---Hello, I am waiting for a number of ATO CQs to get appro"Kirchev, Lazar" ---05/11/2012 06:06:20 AM---Hello, I am waiting for a number of ATO CQs to get approved by the IP, so if these get approved befo

From: "Kirchev, Lazar" <l.kirchev@xxxxxxx>
To: Orbit Developer discussion <orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Date: 05/11/2012 06:06 AM
Subject: Re: [orbit-dev] Declaring Build: I20120509234235 -- ready for RC1?
Sent by: orbit-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx





Hello,
 
I am waiting for a number of ATO CQs to get approved by the IP, so if these get approved before 5/18 I will get these bundles into Orbit. But since the CQs are not yet approved and I donât know with certainty which of them will, I cannot create bugs in Orbit bugzilla with milestone target for RC2.
 
Could you suggest how I can proceed with this?
 
Thanks,
Lazar
 
From: orbit-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:orbit-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David M Williams
Sent:
 Thursday, May 10, 2012 4:00 PM
To:
 Orbit Developer discussion
Subject:
 Re: [orbit-dev] Declaring Build: I20120509234235 -- ready for RC1?
 

Orbiteers,

This build is our current candidate to rename to an S build for downstream projects to use for RC1 builds. How's it look? Any thing else anyone wanted/needed in RC1?


Unless one of you requests otherwise, our deadline for RC1, for Orbit, our -1 day, will be tomorrow, Friday, 5/11, 5 PM.


And THEN, only one week left (normally). We would like to produce an R build on or shortly after 5/18, for use in RC2, and the remainder of Juno builds.


Sound reasonable? Doable?


Please detail anything you would still like to get into RC1 or things you'd like to get into RC2 -- please use the "milestone target" tag in Orbit bugzilla that describe what's going into Orbit.


And, especially, do speak up if anything is in jeopardy of not being done in time for RC2. We can always "break with tradition" if there is substantial reason to, but we should work it out in well in advance so everyone knows what to expect.


Thanks,




Inactive hide details for David M Williams---05/10/2012 01:31:00 AM---  Download Page:David M Williams---05/10/2012 01:31:00 AM---  Download Page:

From:
David M Williams/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
To:
orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx, orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx,
Date:
05/10/2012 01:31 AM
Subject:
[orbit-dev] Declaring Build: I20120509234235
Sent by:
orbit-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx








Download Page:

http://download.eclipse.org/tools/orbit/downloads/drops/I20120509234235

_______________________________________________
orbit-dev mailing list

orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-dev
_______________________________________________
orbit-dev mailing list
orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-dev

GIF image