Re: [orbit-dev] Modifying source of a 3rd party library

[Jeff McAffer <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

This whole topic is interesting.  From a historical perspective (that's 
why you keep us old guys around remember) Orbit was never envisioned to 
actually compile anything.  The scenario actually makes some sense if 
the changes are: actually required required, of general use, not 
disruptive to other uses of the library and not in the originators code 
in time for the consuming project's release.  If these conditions are 
not met then the changes likely should happen in an isolated way in the 
consuming project. 

Either way, seems to me that the bundle should be given an org.eclipse 
name if the real content is being modified (as per Markus' suggestion)

Jeff

Markus Alexander Kuppe wrote:
> Why not change the bundle symbolic naming? Nowadays people should import
> packages rather than require bundles anyway. ;-o
>