Re: [mylar-dev] Connector Tutorial

[Eugene Kuleshov <eu@xxxxxxxx>]

John Vliet wrote:
> The other approach could implement the default functionality as a 
> plugin that would work with minimal extensions. For example you could 
> extend it, adding only a repository name and icons and it would show 
> up in the repository add list and use the default behaviour (perhaps 
> the non-repository task) for task adding, deleting and manipulation. I 
> like this approach, but it would require a bit of work on the Mylar 
> code base itself.
 I would disagree with this. Connector does define contract for the 
features integrator could implement. There is very little (if at all) 
value of implementing none of those features. And I think it is very 
arguable that it would be easier to implement multiple extensions 
instead of filling in stub methods of the abstract class.

 regards,
 Eugene