Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [mylar-dev] Bugzilla Integration

I'm really am sorry to say that there hasn't been any progress on this
front, and I realize that this is a key limiting issue for you and many
others.  Frankly I would have trouble bothering to activate tasks if they
didn't come from the issue tracking repository.  But with the summer
students gone we've been down to one active committer.  Thankfully he's
using Mylar which helps significantly with his productivity ;)  

I do have some good news though: Wesley Coelho has made some significant
contributions to Mylar already, and one thing that's on his list is
implementing a mapping from local tasks to URLs (this is pretty much your
idea Eugene, since you asked for the ability to drag URLs to the task list).
With this in place you will be able double-click a normal task, and if it
has a URL attachment one of the editor tabs will show the bug in the
internal browser.  This will also have the benefit of providing some basic
support for proprietary bug systems that are web based.  It's planned for
0.4: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=111023

After 0.4 one the highest priority things will be to get the multiple
provider stuff going.  But this is an area where we could really use some
community contribution.  Wolfgang, if you are interested in contributing
Eugene's suggestion would be the perfect way to do it, and would have the
benefit of ensuring that Mylar supports your customized repository.

Mik

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mylar-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:mylar-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Eugene Kuleshov
> Sent: October 20, 2005 2:00 PM
> To: Mylar developer discussions
> Subject: Re: [mylar-dev] Bugzilla Integration
> 
> Mik,
> 
> I wonder if there are any progress to support multiple providers for
> issue tracking systems as well as support for multiple issue tracking
> system repositories? That way Wolfgang would just implement its own
> provider and mylar could use its data right away...
> 
> I can see why Eclipse and Mylar team don't pay much attention to this
> issue, but I believe most of the other workd using not only Bugzilla
> repository at eclipse.org. I believe this is very important case
> (especially support for multiple repositories). :-)
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Eugene
> 
> 
> Beer Wolfgang wrote:
> 
> > Dear Mylar Team,
> >
> > Last time i heard about the Mylar project, and more interesting for
> > me, about the
> >
> > Bugzilla/Eclipse integration.
> >
> > Our research company also decided to integrate Bugzilla support into
> > the Eclipse
> >
> > IDE, for convenience purposes.
> >
> > In a spin-off project we implemented a core library in order to access
> > Bugzilla over
> >
> > HTTP and a Bugzilla plugin in order to integrate this functionality
> > into Eclipse.
> >
> > I tested your Bugzilla integration and my first question is, if you
> > had to modify the
> >
> > Bugzilla server in order to access it (we had to do so because
> > Bugzilla delivers
> >
> > Unstructured HTML content and we would like to have structured XML
> > returns).
> >
> > As my company is going to publish our solution as Open Source it would
> > be interesting
> >
> > if we could cooperate in this aspect and to exchange experiences.
> >
> > please tell me your opinions.
> >
> > best greetings
> >
> > Wolfgang
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mylar-dev mailing list
> mylar-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mylar-dev



Back to the top