[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [mosquitto-dev] [mqtt] Re: RSMB now on GitHub
|
I was wondering if it would be possible to run the MQTT-SN RSMB code as
a "plugin" at a Mosquitto level which didn't pre-req those internal
changes. If not there wouldn't be any point
Ideally, what I'd like to get to is a plan for Mosquitto is going, and
how we get MQTT-SN support into it/along with it. So that I know how
much effort to put into RSMB, if any.
Maybe a very close integration between an MQTT-SN gateway and Mosquitto
could somehow be sufficient?
Ian
On 07/07/2016 02:21 PM, Nicholas Humfrey wrote:
[removing the main MQTT mailing list]
I agree that a plugin, or way of making Mosquitto more modular would
be good.
The main thing that I was waiting for/blocking was the re-write of the
Mosquitto events system/model:
https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/mosquitto-dev/msg01167.html
nick.
On 2016-07-07 14:08, Ian Craggs wrote:
I'm not sure what Roger's current plans are for MQTT-SN - I'll check
with him. I am definitely interested in bringing RSMB fixes back into
the Eclipse project so that the project code there is the best and
definitive. I had only held off because I thought that MQTT-SN
support in Mosquitto was "imminent", I didn't want to step on Roger's
toes, and a MQTT-SN gateway working alongside Mosquitto seemed like a
reasonable approach.
My other thought is if there was a way for me to add MQTT-SN support
into Mosquitto as a completely separate module internally, but it
looks integrated, like a plugin.
Ian
On Thursday, 7 July 2016 13:28:45 UTC+1, Nicholas Humfrey wrote:
On 2016-07-06 15:46, Filipe Nicoli wrote:
Ian, I guess mosquitto won't be supporting MQTT-SN for some time.
It's
been on the table for long and the only broker I've seen around is
yours (and a dozen forks of your code).
I'm currently using Michal Foksa's fork, and even his is already 1
year without bug fixes or improvements.
I guess it would be beneficial to the project sticking to one
fork.
What do you think?
Ian,
The main reason why I am interested in RSMB is because of the
MQTT-SN
support. It is easier to run a single server, than a MQTT server and
seperate MQTT-SN (UDP) gateway - less things to setup/go wrong.
I agree that multiple forks isn't ideal. I wasn't actually aware of
the
Michal Foksa fork when I sent my Pull Requests. Get the improvements
back into the main repo, would require going through the changes and
making sure they are approved by the Eclipse Legal process.
nick.
--
To learn more about MQTT please visit http://mqtt.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "MQTT" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to mqtt+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To post to this group, send email to mqtt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/mqtt.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
_______________________________________________
mosquitto-dev mailing list
mosquitto-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mosquitto-dev
--
Ian Craggs
icraggs@xxxxxxxxxx IBM United Kingdom
Paho Project Lead; Committer on Mosquitto