Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [modeling-pmc] Fwd: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Kepler projects that are missing something that's required for the review

While I monitor all PMC mailing lists, and did try to update the records as things evolved on the PMC mailing list, I found that I was duplicating a lot of work when people emailed their documentation and PMC approval links to EMO (which is what most projects have done). So I returned to my normal practice of dealing with requests as they came into my inbox.

Which is what I asked for in a note to cross projects:

http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg09061.html
The deadline to submit your PMC-approved review materials to EMO is June 5/2013. Earlier is fine (better, even). Send me the document, or a link to the document along with a link to the public approval discussion with your PMC. Please do not be late. Let me know if you require assistance. 
The only difference between this and what we've always done is that I am asking for explicit PMC approval.

Whether or not a PMC member can approve their own review documentation is really a matter for the PMC to decide. I just want a public account of the approval.

HTH,

Wayne

On 06/06/2013 01:55 AM, Ed Merks wrote:
Wayne/PMC,

Certainly I've approved OCL already.   As I look down the list it seems to me I've reviewed most if not all the modeling projects I see on your list.  What's needed at this point to ensure that all the things I've already approved are removed from this list?  Were the project owners supposed to forward my review to you, add a link to the approval to their bugzilla, or something else?

I've also submitted reviews for EMF and XSD, but I've not approved my own submissions; that seems somehow wrong.  Is it necessary for some other PMC member to give a +1 for my two projects, or can I do that myself? The latter pretty much implies that anything I submit myself is implicitly approved.  Perhaps some other PMC member would be so kind as to approve EMF and XSD...


Regards,
Ed


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Kepler projects that are missing something that's required for the review
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 06:12:35 +0200
From: Ed Willink <ed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: ed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>


Hi Wayne

I don't think MDT/OCL should be on the list, so I reviewed the Bug 406441 dependences. It appears that the only projects that satisfy you are ones where you have added the PMC approval yourself.

All other projects have a problem at the PMC stage. So it seems that either you or the PMC are failing to complete the approval by updating Bugzillas in response to the approval grant on the PMC mailing list.

    Regards

        Ed Willink

 

On 05.06.2013 23:21, Wayne Beaton wrote:

Greetings folks.

I've built a little Bugzilla query that lists the projects that are missing something that I require for the review.

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?v4=Approved%20IP%20Log&bug_status=NEW&o5=substring&n2=1&f1=blocked&o3=substring&v3=Documentation&o1=equals&f4=attachments.description&v5=pmc_approved&query_format=advanced&f3=keywords&o4=equals&f2=OP&f5=flagtypes.name&v1=406441&list_id=5794737

If your project is on this list, you're missing one of three things:

* Review documentation;
* PMC approval of review documentation; or
* An IP Team-approved IP Log.

The corresponding records for projects that are doing service releases should already be marked as FIXED and so should not be on this list.

If you believe that your project should not be on this list, let me know. We juggle a lot of balls with these releases and it's easy to miss something.

If you're not on this list, you should be included in the "upcoming reviews" section of the Projects Gateway page:

http://eclipse.org/projects/

Let me know if you're missing.

If I'm waiting on you to submit your IP Log, or provide me with PMC-approved review documentation, please provide it ASAP. This was due today. The review starts tomorrow; if I don't have your materials in my inbox tomorrow AM, then you miss the review. If you've submitted your review documentation and your IP Log, but the IP Log hasn't come back, I'll schedule you for the review anyway (the review cannot be declared successful until after the IP Log is approved).

I do not intend to hold a call for this review. If anybody feels strongly in favour of holding a call, let me know.

If you're having trouble meeting any of the requirements, please let me know.

My thanks go out to the projects that paid attention and heeded the deadlines.

Wayne
--
Wayne Beaton
Director of Open Source Projects, The Eclipse Foundation
Learn about Eclipse Projects
EclipseCon France 2013

I

 

 




_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc

--
Wayne Beaton
Director of Open Source Projects, The Eclipse Foundation
Learn about Eclipse Projects
EclipseCon
          France 2013

Back to the top