+1
Wayne Beaton wrote:
Janet, Markus wants to rename Edapt to EMF Migrate. Can you please
initiate a trademark search.
Modeling PMC: are you okay with this name change?
Wayne
On 12/06/2010 07:55 AM, Markus Herrmannsdörfer wrote:
Hi Wayne,
I did a little survey about the name with a number of people. Most of
the people did not like Edapt, because it does not tell anything about
what Edapt does. However, they liked "EMF Migrate", as it is also in
line with the new projects "EMF Refactor" and "EMF Store". So I decided
that I want to rename the Edapt project to "EMF Migrate".
Also I am currently writing an article which is due at the end of the
week. If it is possible to rename the project, I would already use the
new name in order not to confuse people.
So my question to you is: Can you please rename the project? How long
does it take to rename it?
Note it is not necessary to rename the project until the end of this
week, since the article does not appear before the end of the year.
However it would be great if you can make it until then.
I am really sorry for this confusion and hope I did not cause a lot of
extra work for you!
Your help
Cheers,
Markus
Am 06.10.2010 15:05, schrieb Wayne Beaton:
Janet, can you comment on the potential trademark issue?
It's a lot of work for webmaster and our IP team, but we can change the
name. I'd rather get it right early on. Before we start, I'd like to
ask you to make sure that you're sure. Edapt is a name, not a
description; that can work to your advantage with regard to branding
and that sort of thing ("EMF Migration Framework" sounds very generic;
and, FWIW, I can envision other future migration frameworks for EMF).
Have you considered add a by-line, e.g. "Edapt: The EMF Migration
Framework"? Maybe we can make that the project long name?
Wayne
On 06/10/2010 8:56 AM, Markus Herrmannsdörfer wrote:
Hi Wayne,
I have another question associated to Edapt before I commit the code.
Is it possible to rename the project to e.g. "EMF Migration Framework"?
If it is, what are the steps that need to be taken? I am just asking,
because after this long time (to get the required paperwork for the
contribution), I came to realize that Edapt is probably not the best
name for what it does. Furthermore, now, there is commercial software
named Edapt, with which we may get trademark problems.
Thanks in advance for your answer.
Cheers,
Markus
Am 05.10.2010 18:15, schrieb Wayne Beaton:
Hi Markus. The project has been marked as "Incubation conforming". You
should now be able to leverage parallel IP process.
Can you please make the link to COPE open a separate browser tab or
window?
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Links_to_non-eclipse.org_content
Thanks,
Wayne
Markus Herrmannsdörfer wrote:
Hi,
I believe that according to the guidelines the project EMFT Edapt
should be in the Incubation phase now. Can you please update the status
in the database? Can you sent me an email once the status is updated?
Thank you very much.
Cheers,
Markus
--
Markus Herrmannsdörfer Technische Universität München
http://www4.in.tum.de/~herrmama Institut für Informatik
phone: +49 (89) 289-17336 Software & Systems Engineering
fax: +49 (89) 289-17307 Boltzmannstraße 3
room: 01.11.043 85748 Garching
--
Markus Herrmannsdörfer Technische Universität München
http://www4.in.tum.de/~herrmama Institut für Informatik
phone: +49 (89) 289-17336 Software & Systems Engineering
fax: +49 (89) 289-17307 Boltzmannstraße 3
room: 01.11.043 85748 Garching
_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
|