Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [modeling-pmc] [mdt-ocl.dev] Hosting OMG OCL specification development at Ecl; ipse

You might consider doing this on EclipseLabs?  We setup EclipseLabs specifically for these types of projects.

www.eclipselabs.org


Ian


On 12/7/2010 5:06 AM, Ed Willink wrote:
Hi Kenn, Ed

The 'OMG' plugins would be of two forms.

a) Model definitions, e.g. OCL.uml, OCL24.oclstdlib

b) Specification generation tooling, QVTo, Acceleo scripts.

Today, I and to a lesser extent Adolfo are almost the sole contributing participants to both Eclipse OCL and the OMG OCL RTF, so IP is not a particular problem; the underlying specification already has a CQ.

But you're right that this is a pretty bad idea, for instance if Mariano Belaunde, the RTF chair, needs to contribute as well as review we get faced with the difficult corrolary that Mariano would need to become an Eclipse OCL committer.

I guess I'll have to create another SourceForge project, or perhaps further abuse my UMLX SourceForge project that hosts non-IP approved example plugins.

     Regards

        Ed Willink
 
On 06/12/2010 18:14, Kenn Hussey wrote:
Ed,

Where will the IP for these new projects come from? If anything originates from activities of (members of) the RTF instead of directly from you, you'll need to have a CQ approved before committing those changes (since MDT OCL is a "mature" project and hence does not qualify for the parallel IP process).

Cheers,

Kenn

On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 5:24 AM, Ed Willink <ed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi

OMG appear to be unable to provide a CM facility for development of its specifications: UML is hosted at modeldriven.org and requests for a repository for OCL have been ignored.

My OMG RTF activities that make the OCL specification model-generated require a CM repository, so I would like to host some org.omg.ocl... plugins at cvsroot/modeling org.eclipse.mdt/org.eclipse.ocl/omg/... (migrating to GIT post Indigo).

As well as providing a host for OMG, it will also clearly distinguish the 'Eclipse-independent' OMG OCL plugins from the added-value Eclipse OCL plugins while allowing Eclipse OCL to layer on top of the OMG plugins.

Is this within project scope and acceptable?

   Regards

       Ed Willink



_______________________________________________
mdt-ocl.dev mailing list
mdt-ocl.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdt-ocl.dev

_______________________________________________ mdt-ocl.dev mailing list mdt-ocl.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdt-ocl.dev


No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1170 / Virus Database: 426/3300 - Release Date: 12/06/10

_______________________________________________ modeling-pmc mailing list modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc

--
Ian Skerrett
Director of Marketing
Eclipse Foundation
Tel: 613-224-9461 ext 227
Blog: ianskerrett.wordpress.com
Twitter: IanSkerrett

Save the dates for EclipseCon 2011, March 21-24
www.eclipsecon.org

Back to the top