| Re: [modeling-pmc] MDT (EODM, UML2 Tools) Graduation |
| Richard Gronback <richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: modeling-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx 06/07/2007 09:54 AM
|
|
Please respond to
PMC members mailing list <modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To
PMC members mailing list <modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
Re: [modeling-pmc] MDT (EODM, UML2 Tools)
Graduation
Yes, but there could not a “previous release” or else they wouldn’t
just now be exiting incubation, right? It seems this is the first
actual release, and I see previous 0.8 downloads, so to me it makes sense
for this to be 1.0.
Regarding UML2 Tools, I don’t think it’s ready to exit incubation, actually.
Taking a look at the 3 communities, it’s still looks like an incubator.
For development, we have 1 committer from 1 company, along with 2
active contributors from the same company (not so diverse). For adopters,
I don’t know of any commercial products yet building on UML2 Tools. From
the newsgroup activity, the user community still seems fledgling. Then,
there’s the fact that although Michael, Tanya, and Sergey have made great
progress with the 4+ diagrams, it’s still a subset of UML2 diagrams. In
conclusion, I guess I don’t see how spending another release cycle in
incubation for this component is a bad thing.
And then there’s the Europa train... As UML2 Tools is on the train, it
is supposed to be released (exiting incubation) in order to be a part.
This presents a complication, but at the same time seems no different
than last year when GMF itself released/exited incubation but shipped EMFT
components that were not yet out of incubation. This year, it would
seem that MDT is in this boat, releasing in Europa some new components
are incubating. The version number for UML2 Tools would need to reflect
this (even a number approaching but not yet an official 1.0.0). Other
thoughts?
I’m not too familiar with the status of EODM, so will defer to others
to comment until I can take a closer look.
Best,
Rich
On 6/7/07 9:11 AM, "Kenneth Hussey" <khussey@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Rich,
I believe the only restriction is that a major version number (i.e. anything
before the first dot) cannot be used if still in incubation. We chose "2.0"
for EODM because the API, and specification version that it conforms to,
is quite different from the previous release.
Cheers,
Kenn Hussey
Senior Software Developer
Rational Software, IBM Software Group
770 Palladium Drive
Kanata, Ontario, K2V 1C8
T: (613) 599-3980 F: (613) 599-3912
Richard Gronback <richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: modeling-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx 06/07/2007 08:51 AM
Please respond to
PMC members mailing list <modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To
PMC members mailing list <modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
Re: [modeling-pmc] MDT (EODM, UML2 Tools) Graduation
Hi Kenn,
I guess I missed part of this conversation and outcome along the way, but
how can EODM be using the 2.0 release number if it’s not yet out of incubation?
Shouldn’t they both be graduating and releasing a 1.0 version?
Thanks,
Rich
On 6/7/07 8:44 AM, "Kenneth Hussey" <khussey@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I hereby request approval for the EODM and UML2 Tools components of MDT
to graduate from incubation to that we be declare 2.0 and 1.0 releases,
respectively, as part of the upcoming 1.0 release of MDT.
Thanks,
Kenn Hussey
Senior Software Developer
Rational Software, IBM Software Group
770 Palladium Drive
Kanata, Ontario, K2V 1C8
T: (613) 599-3980 F: (613) 599-3912
--
Richard C. Gronback
Borland Software Corporation
richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx
+1 860 227 9215_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc