RE: [modeling-pmc] FW: Teneo

["Vatkov, Bogdan" <bogdan.vatkov@xxxxxxx>]

Hi Bjorn, Janet, 

I am one of the potential users of Teneo. I am now really confused about
the legal status of the project inside eclipse.org.

Did I get the statement right that the Eclipse Foundation is never going
to provide a legal advice on the topic?
I see there is already a long thread about Teneo/Hibernate or EPL/LGPL
licensing issue. An impression is forming that either Teneo or Hibernate
are not welcomed in the community. Is that the case?
I guess that if the Teneo project is important for the MDSD interested
community then this licensing issue would be resolved immediately.
Is it the case that the target/focus/scope of the Teneo project is not
clear to the Foundation?

I really hope that all my questions up till now have negative answers
and that the Foundation will contact real license experts and will then
provide a clear statement about the future of the Teneo project inside
Eclipse.

Excuse me if my email sounds offensive. I just want the community to
have a clear statement about the status of the project.

Thanks in advance!

Best regards,
Bogdan

-----Original Message-----
From: modeling-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:modeling-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bjorn
Freeman-Benson
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 8:02 PM
To: Ed Merks
Cc: Janet Campbell; 'PMC members mailing list'
Subject: Re: [modeling-pmc] FW: Teneo

Ed,
The Foundation does not (will not) provide legal advice. Sorry.

Ed Merks wrote:
> So in your opinion, is the interpretation of LGPL by Hibernate is
> incorrect?  If so, what specifically are they interpreting
incorrectly?
>   
_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc