Re: [modeling-pmc] Re: modeling-pmc Digest, Vol 10, Issue 13

[Richard Gronback <richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Title: Re: [modeling-pmc] Re: modeling-pmc Digest, Vol 10, Issue 13

Right, that was the context of the discussion.  I guess the notes don’t make it clear, but it’s as we understand it.

Thanks,
Rich


On 2/25/07 1:18 PM, "Bjorn Freeman-Benson" <bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Rich,
I notice that the minutes say "Agreed, along with some discussion to clarify the intent and nature of parallel IP process benefits to be gained and how this may be different for non-incubation projects that may still contain incubating components." ... please note that the parallel IP process is Board approved only on a *project* level, thus a Mature Phase project that contains incubating components does not qualify for the parallel IP process. Another good reason to incubate new components in an Incubation Phase project.

- Bjorn

The PMC was in agreement with keeping EMFT as an incubator: http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Modeling_PMC_Meeting%2C_2007-02-20
 
 

---

_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc

-- 
Richard C. Gronback
Borland Software Corporation
richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx
+1 860 227 9215