[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
RE: [modeling-pmc] Modeling Project now has an Orbit Committer
|
sorry :)
... I should file a request against Orbit as a next
step?
Artem
LPG 1.1 was approved for our use by Eclipse Legal, and
since I do not want to dig deep into details what's the diffence between 1.0
and 1.1, I prefer using latest. Guess, I should
Artem
Hi, Artem,
I have already contributed version 1.0 of the LPG
Java Runtime to Orbit as net.sourceforge.lpg.lpgjavaruntime (on the v1_0
branch). If it's as good as v1.1 for you (I understand the principal
difference being in the documentation), then you may want to consider using
that in GMF? Otherwise, once you have obtained clearance for v1.1 (in
GMF) from the EMO, then we could get that contributed, too. In either
case, GMF must obtain permission from EMO to use whichever version of this
library, independently of OCL or any other project.
Of course, given that both OCL and GMF are in the
Europa simultaneous release, we should agree on a common version of LPG that
we can both use.
Cheers,
Christian
Christian W.
Damus
Component Lead, MDT UML2 OCL and EMFT-QTV
IBM
Rational Software
"Artem Tikhomirov"
<Artem.Tikhomirov@xxxxxxxxxxx> Sent by:
modeling-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
11/29/06 09:48 AM
Please respond
to PMC members mailing list
<modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
To
| "PMC members mailing list"
<modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| RE: [modeling-pmc] Modeling
Project now has an Orbit
Committer |
|
Hi Christian,
Which
version of LPG you are going to contribute to the Orbit project? AFAIK, OCL
component uses 1.0, is it the version being contributed? In GMF, we use LPG
1.1 now (which is almost the same as 1.0 from runtime point of view),
perhaps, it makes sense to put it to the Orbit as well?
Best wishes,
Artem
From: modeling-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:modeling-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Christian
Damus
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 10:38 PM
To:
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [modeling-pmc] Modeling Project
now has an Orbit Committer
Hi, all,
I have just been inducted as a committer on the
Orbit project, with an initial contribution of the LPG Java Runtime library
used by the OCL component (in MDT).
As far as I know, I am the first Modeling project
committer to be a member of the Orbit team. To ensure that the number
of committers on the Orbit project doesn't get out of hand, and to
streamline the process of contributing third-party libraries, Orbit would
like to keep the number of committers from each contributing project to
scale with the number of third-party libraries that they are contributing.
Thus, I am available to contribute bundles to Orbit on behalf of any
Modeling project or component that has third-party dependencies that it
wants to consume from Orbit. For example, I understand that GMF has an
Apache Batik dependency that I would be happy to contribute to Orbit, and to
maintain as GMF adopts successive versions of it.
The principal requirement for
contribution to Orbit is that the library in question first be approved by
EMO for use in the contributing project. For more details, see
http://www.eclipse.org/orbit.
The effort involved in Orbit-izing a bundle is
relatively small, but of course, if Modeling has many third-party bundles to
maintain, then I may need some help. :-)
Thanks,
Christian
Christian W. Damus
Component Lead, MDT UML2 OCL and
EMFT-QTV
IBM Rational Software_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc
mailing
list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc