Re: [modeling-pmc] GMF Committer Vote for Boris Blajer

[Frederic Plante <fplante@xxxxxxxxxx>]

+1

Sébastien Demathieu <sebastien.demathieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: modeling-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

10/10/2006 11:53 AM

Please respond to
PMC members mailing list <modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	PMC members mailing list <modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	Re: [modeling-pmc] GMF Committer Vote for Boris Blajer

+1

Sébastien

Jean Bezivin a écrit :
> +1
> 
> Jean
> 
> On 10/10/06, Kenneth Hussey <khussey@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>>
>> Given that each of our project leads is ON the Modeling PMC, this
makes
>> sense to me too.
>>
>> + 1
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Kenn Hussey
>>
>>  Senior Software Developer
>>  Rational Software, IBM Software Group
>>
>>  770 Palladium Drive
>>  Kanata, Ontario, K2V 1C8
>>
>>  T: (613) 599-3980  F: (613) 599-3912
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "Richard Gronback" <Richard.Gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent by: modeling-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> 10/07/2006 12:36 PM
>>
>> Please respond to
>>  PMC members mailing list <modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> To "PMC members mailing list" <modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
"PMC members
>> mailing list" <modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> cc
>> Subject RE: [modeling-pmc] GMF Committer Vote for Boris Blajer
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I agree with you both, and we may want to override this terminology
in 
>> the
>> standard charter.  I re-read it just before sending it out,
and it 
>> could be
>> interpreted that there is formal approval required:
>>
>>  "If there are at least 3 positive votes and no negative
votes within the
>> voting period, the Developer is recommended to the PMC for commit
>> privileges. The PMC may waive the 3 vote minimum requirement in
>> exceptional
>> cases (e.g., there are fewer than 3 active committers on the project).
If
>> the PMC also approves, and the Developer signs the appropriate
New 
>> Committer
>> agreements..."
>>
>>  Although it starts out as "... is recommended to the
PMC..." it is 
>> followed
>> by "If the PMC also approves..." which to me implied
something formal, 
>> hence
>> the vote request.
>>
>>  No big deal, as I didn't think anyone would object to our
Committer vote
>> results.  In Technology, each Project Lead acts as the PMC
in these 
>> cases,
>> so doing the same within Modeling would be great, imo.
>>
>>  Thanks,
>>  Rich
>>
>>
>>  -----Original Message-----
>>  From: modeling-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Jean
>> Bezivin
>>  Sent: Sat 10/7/2006 8:47 AM
>>  To: PMC members mailing list
>>  Subject: Re: [modeling-pmc] GMF Committer Vote for Boris
Blajer
>>
>>  Rich,
>>
>>  My interpretation was the same than Ed's,
>>  but we may check that with Bjorn this week.
>>
>>  In case it is necessary, +1 also for me.
>>
>>  Best regards,
>>
>>  Jean
>>
>>
>>  On 10/7/06, Ed Merks <merks@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > Rich,
>>  >
>>  > I didn't think the PMC had to vote to approve a decision
about 
>> committers
>>  > made by a subproject.  I thought only existing
committers for that
>>  > subproject or a component of that subproject needed
to approve.   I'll
>> ask
>>  > Bjorn about that next week.  I have no basis for
deciding to vote 
>> yes or
>> no,
>>  > so if we are required to vote, my policy will be to
approve the 
>> vote of
>> the
>>  > subproject, i.e., to rubber stamp it. :-)
>>  >
>>  > So my vote, if one is necessary, is +1
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
>>  > mailto: merks@xxxxxxxxxx
>>  > 905-413-3265  (t/l 969)
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >   *"Richard Gronback" <Richard.Gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>*
>>  > Sent by: modeling-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>  >
>>  > 10/07/2006 03:38 AM   Please respond to
>>  > PMC members mailing list <modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>  >
>>  >    To
>>  > <modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>  cc
>>  >   Subject
>>  > [modeling-pmc] GMF Committer Vote for Boris Blajer
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > This email serves as a summary of a vote taken on the
gmf-dev mailing
>> list
>>  > regarding the committer vote for Boris Blajer.
>>  >
>> http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/gmf-dev/msg00759.html
>>  >
>>  > We have had 11 +1 votes with 0 -1 votes, and the vote
has been open 
>> for
>>  > greater than the required week, per the standard top-level
charter.
>>  >
>>  > We request a vote from the PMC for Boris Blajer to
be added as a
>> Committer
>>  > on the GMF project.
>>  >
>>  > My vote: +1
>>  >
>>  > Thanks,
>>  > Rich
>>  > _______________________________________________
>>  > modeling-pmc mailing list
>>  > modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>  > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > _______________________________________________
>>  > modeling-pmc mailing list
>>  > modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>  > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>
>>
>>  --
>>  __________________________________
>>  Jean Bézivin - ATLAS Group (INRIA & LINA) - University
of Nantes - 2, 
>> rue
>> de
>>  la Houssinière
>>  44322 Nantes cedex 3 - France
>>  tel. +33 2 51 12 58 13 - fax. +33 2 51 12 58 12 - cell.+33
6 14 32 22 36
>>  - e.mail: Jean.Bezivin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>  http://www.sciences.univ-nantes.fr/lina/atl/ - Skype:
>> jbezivin
>>  ---------------------------------------
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  modeling-pmc mailing list
>>  modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>  https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> modeling-pmc mailing list
>> modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc