Gustavo,
Thanks for pulling in the bugzilla updates. I'll second the
notion that for this release we use the MTJ bugzilla for technical discussions,
bugs, patches, etc. As for the repository, I also agree that due to the short
timelines we should commit to using MTJ as the vehicle for Galileo development.
I'm not sure if you were the one who created the SDK provider
guidelines, but I'd like to get some feedback on req3; network access. It lists
the site must be available via HTTPS, is that a hard req, if so what's the
background? We can discuss in the call tomorrow if preferred.
Regards,
Ronnie
From:
mobile-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:mobile-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of ext Paula Gustavo-WGP010
Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 9:20 AM
To: Mobile Industry Working Group
Subject: RES: [mobile-iwg] Weekly (Technical) Pulsar Call - Thursday,
April 9th
Hi,
I just created a component in MTJ bugzilla called
“Pulsar”. If you guys want, we can use it to open bugs, attach
patches, etc. (the main URL to file bugs is: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/enter_bug.cgi?product=MTJ.
Just select “Pulsar” component). It is also possible to use the working group wiki. It is open to
everyone to add / edit pages.
Since there is no pulsar specific repository right now, we can also
use MTJ. We can adapt MTJ build to generate a Pulsar specific feature with all
code that will be part of Pulsar distribution (at least that’s what we
initially imagined). So if anyone ants to contribute code on pulsar, he needs
to follow a usual eclipse contribution process:
-
File a bug on MTJ/Pulsar
-
Attach the contribution
-
MTJ committers will review and commit the code to the SVN that will
be available on the next nightly build
Does that make sense?
J
gep
De: mobile-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:mobile-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Em nome de Ronnie.King@xxxxxxxxx
Enviada em: terça-feira, 7 de abril de 2009 22:38
Para: mobile-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
Assunto: Re: [mobile-iwg] Weekly (Technical) Pulsar Call - Thursday,
April 9th
Todd,
Thanks for jumping in with this, the p2 api’s are the area that we have
the most concern with right now. Any information you could provide would be
really appreciated. Since we do not have a bugzilla to track this with, for
simplicity I’d say let’s just use email for now.
Regards,
Ronnie
On 4/7/09 6:39 PM, "ext Christian Kurzke" <christian@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Todd, Ronnie,
Thanks for stepping up so quickly!
Todd,
Depending on the type of write-up your team has done, you can either
update (or create a new page) on the Wiki site.
Or, if it is easier - just mail out an attachment to this list, we can
use it as a basis for discussion in the call on Thursday.
Unfortunately we dont yet have a proper "document repository" for
Pulsar.
-Christian
Todd Williams wrote:
> Christian & Ronnie
> I asked my some of my Pulse <http://www.poweredbypulse.com>
team for
> guidance on how you could implement the SDK delivery requirements
> using native p2. They wrote up a quick set up steps and a bit of
> example code to illustrate the points. I was going to ask on the
> Thursday call what you thought would be the best way to contribute the
> information to the group. However, I saw Ronnie's message and didn't
> want his team to waste time if the information I had would give them a
> headstart. So, would updating the wiki be the best way to communicate
> this information?
> Regards,
> Todd
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Ronnie.King@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:Ronnie.King@xxxxxxxxx>
> *To:* mobile-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:mobile-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 07, 2009 5:35 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [mobile-iwg] Weekly (Technical)
Pulsar Call -
> Thursday, April 9th
>
> Hi Christian,
>
> I have allocated two developers on my team to
start research on
> the p2 engine and viewer requirements as of today.
I’ll work on
> updating the wiki pages to reflect the areas that
we are planning
> on contributing to.
>
> Some areas that would be helpful to clarify:
>
> * Are we tracking the
feature discussions in MTJ’s bugzilla as
> we do in other
projects such as CDT? If so, should there be
> a Pulsar
component added?
> * Do you have a location
in MTJ svn for hosting the code?
>
>
> Regards,
> Ronnie
>
>
> On 4/6/09 6:42 PM, "ext Christian Kurzke"
<christian@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> Hello Everyone,
>
> After a very busy
EclipseCon meeting, I would like to resume the
> Bi-Weekly Pulsar Meeting
Schedule.
>
> The main focus of this
meeting is to review the list of tasks
> which need
> to be accomplished by
working group members before the Galileo
> deadline.
>
> For an overview, please
see:
> http://wiki.eclipse.org/EMIWG/GalileoExecutionPlan
>
> This diagram shows a large
number of tasks currently are NOT
> STAFFED.
> On the right side I
included a column with my best judgment
> which company
> would posses the right
skills for this task.
> A more detailed
description of the expected skills can be
> found here:
> http://wiki.eclipse.org/EMIWG/GalileoPulsarWorkItems
>
> I ask every company to
review those items and for the meeting
> make a
> decision if they can
contribute engineering headcount for any
> of those
> tasks.
> (Please note: My assignment
of company names to tasks is only a
> suggestion, and of course
not binding!)
>
> The full agenda with
dial-in information is here:
>
> http://wiki.eclipse.org/EMIWG/MembersCall-09-April-2009
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Christian Kurzke
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
> mobile-iwg mailing list
> mobile-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-iwg
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> mobile-iwg mailing list
> mobile-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-iwg
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> mobile-iwg mailing list
> mobile-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-iwg
>
_______________________________________________
mobile-iwg mailing list
mobile-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-iwg
