| Re: [mobile-iwg] Weekly (Technical) Pulsar Call - Thursday, April 9th |
Hi Todd, Ronnie,
Thanks for stepping up so quickly!
Todd,
Depending on the type of write-up your team has done, you can either
update (or create a new page) on the Wiki site.
Or, if it is easier - just mail out an attachment to this list, we can
use it as a basis for discussion in the call on Thursday.
Unfortunately we dont yet have a proper "document repository" for Pulsar.
-Christian
Todd Williams wrote:
> Christian & Ronnie
> I asked my some of my Pulse <http://www.poweredbypulse.com> team for
> guidance on how you could implement the SDK delivery requirements
> using native p2. They wrote up a quick set up steps and a bit of
> example code to illustrate the points. I was going to ask on the
> Thursday call what you thought would be the best way to contribute the
> information to the group. However, I saw Ronnie's message and didn't
> want his team to waste time if the information I had would give them a
> headstart. So, would updating the wiki be the best way to communicate
> this information?
> Regards,
> Todd
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Ronnie.King@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:Ronnie.King@xxxxxxxxx>
> *To:* mobile-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:mobile-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 07, 2009 5:35 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [mobile-iwg] Weekly (Technical) Pulsar Call -
> Thursday, April 9th
>
> Hi Christian,
>
> I have allocated two developers on my team to start research on
> the p2 engine and viewer requirements as of today. I’ll work on
> updating the wiki pages to reflect the areas that we are planning
> on contributing to.
>
> Some areas that would be helpful to clarify:
>
> * Are we tracking the feature discussions in MTJ’s bugzilla as
> we do in other projects such as CDT? If so, should there be
> a Pulsar component added?
> * Do you have a location in MTJ svn for hosting the code?
>
>
> Regards,
> Ronnie
>
>
> On 4/6/09 6:42 PM, "ext Christian Kurzke" <christian@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> Hello Everyone,
>
> After a very busy EclipseCon meeting, I would like to resume the
> Bi-Weekly Pulsar Meeting Schedule.
>
> The main focus of this meeting is to review the list of tasks
> which need
> to be accomplished by working group members before the Galileo
> deadline.
>
> For an overview, please see:
> http://wiki.eclipse.org/EMIWG/GalileoExecutionPlan
>
> This diagram shows a large number of tasks currently are NOT
> STAFFED.
> On the right side I included a column with my best judgment
> which company
> would posses the right skills for this task.
> A more detailed description of the expected skills can be
> found here:
> http://wiki.eclipse.org/EMIWG/GalileoPulsarWorkItems
>
> I ask every company to review those items and for the meeting
> make a
> decision if they can contribute engineering headcount for any
> of those
> tasks.
> (Please note: My assignment of company names to tasks is only a
> suggestion, and of course not binding!)
>
> The full agenda with dial-in information is here:
>
> http://wiki.eclipse.org/EMIWG/MembersCall-09-April-2009
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Christian Kurzke
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mobile-iwg mailing list
> mobile-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-iwg
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> mobile-iwg mailing list
> mobile-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-iwg
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> mobile-iwg mailing list
> mobile-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-iwg
>
_______________________________________________
mobile-iwg mailing list
mobile-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-iwg