Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [mdt-ocl.dev] Juno SR2 RC1
Hi Ed,

Thank you for the suggestion. You are right we missed the increment at SR1. However, as commented in the bugzilla [1], I prefer to follow the policy in which a x.y.2 increment means that a plugin change has occurred since SR1.

Since you didn't mind it, I finally decided to set the 3.1.2 for it.

[1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=394152

Cheers,
Adolfo.

2013/1/14 Ed Willink <ed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi

The bug/394152 branch now has three additional version increments; one catching a late SR1 properties change.

uml.tests missed a +0.0.1 for SR1 when a test was retracted. Re-instated so now the same as 3.1.0 again. Should actually be 4.x rather than 3.x so I think it best to leave it at 3.1.0 since it is actually the same as 3.1.0.

    Regards

        Ed



On 14/01/2013 12:08, Ed Willink wrote:
Hi Adolfo

This will be the first no-CVS maintenance build, so you will need to migrate the elimination of CVS that I put in *.rmap for the main build.

Unfortunately without a fix for https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=397026, we will no longer be distributing the library example.

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=396859 may also need attention.

    Regards

        Ed

On 14/01/2013 11:06, Adolfo Sanchez-Barbudo Herrera wrote:
Hi Ed,

A good chance to try to oil the rusty machine ;). I'll review all the changes and try to understand the new stuff.

Cheers,
Adolfo.


On 14 January 2013 10:51, Ed Willink <ed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi

Thanks for the reminder.

No plans.

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=394152 has a patch awaiting a review by you. You can probably satisfy yourself quite quickly that any possible impact is limited to examples plugins. The only 'difficult'  bit is the version numbers.

We made such a mess of the early Kepler version numbers that these will need careful review.

        Regards

            Ed


On 14/01/2013 10:36, Adolfo Sanchez-Barbudo Herrera wrote:
Hi Ed,

Could you send to me your plan of introducing any change to the maintenance branch during today/following days ?.

I've discovered a branch which may be you want to merge into the maintenance branch:

origin/bug/394152

N.B: SR2 RC1+1 is today.

Cheers,
Adolfo.


No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.2890 / Virus Database: 2638/6031 - Release Date: 01/13/13



No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.2890 / Virus Database: 2638/6031 - Release Date: 01/13/13




_______________________________________________
mdt-ocl.dev mailing list
mdt-ocl.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdt-ocl.dev


No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.2890 / Virus Database: 2638/6031 - Release Date: 01/13/13



_______________________________________________
mdt-ocl.dev mailing list
mdt-ocl.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdt-ocl.dev


Back to the top