Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [mdt-ocl.dev] Ramp down to Indigo - Bugzillas

Ed,

El 06/05/2011 11:01, Ed Willink escribió:
Hi Adolfo

We're after the M7 feature freeze, so it's too late to start breaking up core/examples features. For Juno, if the examples are promoted to non-examples, we then need a separate tools build and clear core/tools test partitioning.

I adjusted the 'pivot' examples plugins to:
- inherit as many dependencies as possible via required bundles
- specify no Eclipse Platform range
- specify typically 2.5 to 3.0 for EMF
- specify 3.0 to 4.0 for UML
- specify 2.0 to 3.0 for Xtext

I don't want to break anything, setting the proper maximum version range of a plugin dependency which only sets the minimum range doesn't break anything. If your plugins don't suffer of this, good ;). I'll ensure that other examples plugins don't suffer this problem, neither. BTW, I was talking about splitting the tests feature rather than the examples feature itself...


Since Xtext 2.0 runs on Helios, this gives users a chance of installing the examples editors on Helios too. Not supported, but might work.
If your editors depended on OCL core stuff, which depends on EMF 2.7 stuff, I don't think that they might work in a pure Helios installation... actually they couldn't even be installed, could they ?.

P.S: Giving that you prefer I postpone the core/tools jobs experiments, I'll simply commit the stuff as long as it doesn't impact the current stuff, for instance, the new build features.

Best Regards,
Adolfo.

    Ed


On 06/05/2011 10:43, Adolfo Sánchez-Barbudo Herrera wrote:
Ed,

Adolfo: you might progress relengs, in particular

335459 - plugin dependencies RESOLVED
Concerning this bug. I think that there are discussions still open:

- Are we providing any backwards compatibility? In principle, since we are depending on EMF 2.7 stuff, MDT/OCL 3.1.0 can't be executed in any Helios installation. I guess that the official answer to this question is  "No, we don't provide any backwards compatibility"
- What do we want to do with our plugin dependencies version ranges ? I guess that being close to RC1, changing plugin dependencies is not an option. Perhaps, we could just fix those plugins (from examples, if there is still any) which only set a minimum version range so that they also set the maximum version range. I'll have a look to this...
340758 - plugin dependencies RESOLVED

I'd also like to do some tries to core and tools jobs during some next week days... If I can't find any stable stuff before wednesday I'll revert the core job's configuration to use the current stuff. In principle, I'll commit two new build features:

- org.eclipse.ocl.releng.core.build-feature
- org.eclipse.ocl.releng.tools.build-feature

On the other hand we would need some any extras for the tests. We would require to split the tests between core and examples tests

Best,
Regards.
--
Open Canarias, S.L.
Adolfo Sánchez-Barbudo Herrera
adolfosbh(at)opencanarias(dot)com
C/Elías Ramos González, 4, ofc. 304
38001 SANTA CRUZ DE TENERIFE
Tel.: +34 922 240231
_______________________________________________ mdt-ocl.dev mailing list mdt-ocl.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdt-ocl.dev


No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1325 / Virus Database: 1500/3618 - Release Date: 05/05/11


_______________________________________________ mdt-ocl.dev mailing list mdt-ocl.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdt-ocl.dev

--
Open Canarias, S.L.
Adolfo Sánchez-Barbudo Herrera
adolfosbh(at)opencanarias(dot)com
C/Elías Ramos González, 4, ofc. 304
38001 SANTA CRUZ DE TENERIFE
Tel.: +34 922 240231

Back to the top