[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [mat-dev] Memory Analyzer 1.12 and Eclipse 2021-06
|
Agree w/ plan for Java 11.
- From my pov the GarbageCleaner improvements are isolated enough that
if we want to, we can ship them.
- The memory mapping is technically viable but I think it would be
good to get some other opinions, think about a strategy for our users,
etc. This would require a shift for user configuration between heap
and disk IO. It might need some heuristics to automatically decide
which to use, or feature flags to allow user control.
- I see one issue that (imo) is a blocker, I think this needs some
further investigation, as I am seeing heaps with incomplete retained
sets especially from threads in
flight:https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=569223
Thanks
Jason
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 6:33 AM Kevin Grigorenko
<kevin.grigorenko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hey Andrew, I think it makes sense to move to Java 11.
>
> --
> Kevin Grigorenko
> IBM App Platform SWAT
>
>
>
>
> From: Andrew Johnson <andrew_johnson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Memory Analyzer Dev list" <mat-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 04/26/2021 10:24 PM
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [mat-dev] Memory Analyzer 1.12 and Eclipse 2021-06
> Sent by: "mat-dev" <mat-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ________________________________
>
>
>
> Should we contribute Memory Analyzer 1.12 to Eclipse 2021-06 ? I've put an outline plan here: https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/tools.mat/releases/1.12Release date and content are just first ideas, for discussion. The main items not yet
> Should we contribute Memory Analyzer 1.12 to Eclipse 2021-06 ?
>
> I've put an outline plan here: https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/tools.mat/releases/1.12Release date and content are just first ideas, for discussion.
>
> The main items not yet finished are Jason Koch's improvements for large dumps - there might still be time to get some of those in.
>
> Also, should we move the stand-alone builds up to Eclipse 2021-06 ? The main reason would be to get fixes for some security bugs in Jetty and Eclipse Help. The main downside is the requirement for Java 11 - we could do another build based as now on Eclipse 2020-03 who don't mind the possible security risks (e.g. a single user system might be less vulnerable.)
>
> Andrew Johnson
>
>
>
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU_______________________________________________
> mat-dev mailing list
> mat-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mat-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mat-dev mailing list
> mat-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mat-dev
